Analysis by WorldTribune Staff, February 16, 2021
Facebook has “reduced distribution” and imposed other “restrictions” on WorldTribune.com, saying a coronavirus-related article reviewed by an “independent fact-checker” contained “false content.”
Covid-related articles in the New York Post and other alternative news sites also appear to have struck sensitive nerves in Silicon Valley’s “Big Tech”.
The Feb. 10 article, headlined “Report: CDC illegally inflated covid mortality numbers by 1,600 percent,” cites a Feb. 1 report by National File which included details from a peer-reviewed October 2020 report by the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge.
The National File report states that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) inflated coronavirus mortality numbers by 1,600 percent.
“The CDC illegally inflated the covid fatality numbers,” the report noted, citing a study published by the Public Health Initiative of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge.
Facebook also said it was limiting the sharing of WorldTribune articles due to unspecified “fact-check” objections to another article:
‘Absolute proof’: The pillow guy documents voting data fraud, February 6, 2021
“Independent of the alleged ‘false content’ tagged by Facebook’s ‘fact checkers’, we have noted a dramatic suppression of shares and reach of WorldTribune.com content after Labor Day 2020. This would appear to be a deliberate effort to throttle freedom of the American press in an election year,” said Robert Morton, senior editor at WorldTribune.com.
“Google is also sending almost daily violation alerts on articles at odds with their rigidly-enforced covid narrative,” Morton said. A recent example was an opinion column from a UN correspondent: ‘WHO’s back, chortles Dr. Fauci? But WHY?‘ that was labeled “dangerous” but with no explanation.
The National File report about the CDC can be viewed here.
The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge study can be viewed here.
The fact-check report relied upon by Facebook said: “The CDC didn’t change the rules on cause-of-death reporting. The guidances on filling out Parts I and II of the death certificate in 2003 and 2020 are identical.” It denied that “the number of COVID-19 deaths are inflated. In fact, the evidence indicates that the number of COVID-19 deaths are undercounted.”
Others who have not strictly followed Facebook’s narrative on the coronavirus have also run afoul of its heavy hand.
Conservative activist Candace Owens said in November she planned to sue Facebook’s third-party fact-checkers over censorship of her social media posts.
“Quite literally a doctor gave his opinion about COVID-19, which I shared, and Facebook issued a strike on my account because they said only information that they agree with about COVID-19 … was acceptable,” Owens said.
Owens said her Facebook page was demonetized as a result.
“The fact-checkers. .. they are activists for the Left that shut down your speech if they don’t like it,” Owens said.
In April of last year, the New York Post slammed Facebook’s fact-checkers for flagging a Feb. 23, 2020 opinion piece by Steven Mosher saying that China’s story about the origins of covid couldn’t be trusted. Mosher argued that the virus might have jumped to the human population thanks to errors at a Chinese laboratory in Wuhan, rather than via that city’s now-notorious “wet market.”
“The piece was widely read online — until Facebook stepped in,” the New York Post noted. “The social media giant’s ‘fact checkers’ decided this was not a valid opinion. If you tried to share Mosher’s column on Facebook, the social network stuck a ‘False Information’ alert on top, saying that finding was ‘checked by independent fact-checkers’ and preventing your friends from clicking to connect to the original article to see for themselves.”
The Post added: “Again, this was an opinion column, not a news report.”
In the ensuing months, it became clear that U.S. national security officials believed the virus came from the Wuhan lab. Fox News and The Washington Post reported as much.
“As a significant source of news for much of the world’s population, Facebook has a clear responsibility to do better: If it’s going to block ‘false’ information, it needs better fact-checkers — and more people watching over those watchmen,” the New York Post noted. “When your defense against ‘fake news’ all but kills free discussion, your system is worse than no defense at all.”