Elections? Left moving aggressively to seize power by other means

by WorldTribune Staff, September 13, 2019

Some on the Left have decided that there is no need to win an election at the ballot box when they can rig it in their favor before the first ballot is even cast, a former congressman said.

Trolling Republican town halls, nationalizing local elections, weaponizing non-profits and the practice of “ballot harvesting” are some of the strategies the Left is employing to fundamentally change U.S. elections, former Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz notes in his new book “Power Grab: The Liberal Scheme to Undermine Trump, the GOP, and Our Republic”.

Jason Chaffetz. / C-SPAN

Chaffetz, who served on and chaired the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and is now a Fox News contributor, detailed the Left’s strategies at the Heritage Foundation on Sept. 10.

Chaffetz said the Left has been successful in deploying activists and media allies, shipping many of them in from other states, to disrupt local town hall meetings held by conservative politicians.

During his last term in Congress, Chaffetz said Democrats mobilized a group called Indivisible Utah, which “had a specific manual to take over a town hall meeting.”

The leftist group’s strategy was to create the impression that Chaffetz was being attacked by his own constituents over his support for President Donald Trump.

“[T]hey wanted to create this illusion that a conservative Republican in a safe district — who just happened to be chairman of the Oversight Committee with the newly minted president of the United States, Donald Trump — that his voters were mad,” Chaffetz said.

“It was used as a tool and a prop. They paid people to come in. There were people from all kinds of states there. But they wanted to create this media illusion that it was an organic Utah phenomenon in a conservative Republican’s district.”

Leftists have also determined that, if they can’t win elections, they can just skew them in their favor. Chaffetz said this strategy can be seen in the legislative priorities of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

“If you look at the priorities that they have put forward in Congress and you look through any poll that’s out there about what are the most important issues, you’re going to hear about health care, you are going to hear about the economy, you’re going to hear about immigration.”

But this isn’t what the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives prioritized.

“Why is it that Nancy Pelosi has H.R. 1, House Resolution 1 … what is her first bill? Does it have anything to do [with] Pew’s top 20 or top 50 issues? No, it doesn’t,” Chaffetz said.

“H.R. 1 is about how to reconfigure elections. [Pelosi] wants to reconstitute how we do elections in this country because it’s their calculus. This is my theory that I lay out in the book, that they have to reconfigure how we do voting in this country for them to win long-term.”

H.R. 1, which the House passed but was never brought up for a vote in the Senate, would have made a number of changes to America’s election system. Among them are mandatory voter registration, a mandate that states allow felons to vote, and a ban on states setting their own rules about voting by mail.

These are just a few of the bill’s many proposals. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called the bill a “naked attempt to change the rules of American politics to benefit one party.”

Another of strategy that has been effective for the Left, Chaffetz said, is manipulating loopholes to weaponize nonprofit groups.

Nonprofits often hire for-profit groups to do fundraising using what’s called a 990 form, and one of the most prominent fundraisers for liberal groups is Grassroots Campaigns Inc.

“They will put on t-shirts — ACLU, Southern Poverty Law Center, Planned Parenthood — and then they’ll start knocking on doors,” Chaffetz said.

“Planned Parenthood will say ‘Hey, we’re raising money, 50 bucks, you know, for Planned Parenthood. You with us or against us?”

The person then might reply: “Oh, I love Planned Parenthood. Yeah I’ll give you $100.’ What does that tell you about that voter? … You think they are going to vote for a Democrat or do you think they are going to vote for the Republican?”

This process, Chaffetz says, allows Grassroots Campaigns Inc. to collect data on voters that can help predict voter behavior. The people working for these groups can then carry the collected voter data when they go to work for campaigns or a political party, like the Democratic National Committee, “bypassing all of the campaign finance rules.”

Then there is “ballot harvesting,” which Chaffetz said noted is when an individual doesn’t have to be present to cast a vote. Instead, their vote can be cast by someone else.

“Democrats, in legislation, have supported the idea. They want to make this [the] law everywhere you go, that you do not actually have to be present to vote,” Chaffetz said.

“Vote harvesting allows someone [to] go around … collecting ballots from all of you. [They] can go knock on your door and say, ‘I know that you didn’t get to the poll, I know that you didn’t fill out your ballot, I know it’s inconvenient for you, but if you just give me your ballot, you know, fill it out, I’ll turn it in for you.”

A lot can go wrong with this process, Chaffetz said. He noted that even in Utah, thousands of votes for Democrats are alleged to have rolled in “after the deadline.”

The Daily Signal’s Jarrett Stepman, host of The Right Side of History podcast, noted that “Ballot harvesting made a huge impact in recent California elections, where the tactic threw a huge number of House Republican seats to Democrats. Thousands of new and unexpected voters showed up to certain districts and flipped seats.”

Chaffetz added: “I don’t know how you win an election in California when Democrats play by different rules than Republicans and engage in this type of vote harvesting.”

Intelligence Brief __________ Replace The Media