by WorldTribune Staff, July 7, 2020
There are ways to fight back against America’s college campuses that are openly hostile to any conservative thought, a citizen journalist and Duke University alumnus noted.
It is no secret that those prevalent in the Black Lives Matter and Antifa movements were radicalized at U.S. universities.
But as much as that radical leftist ideology infests the nation’s colleges, they are still addicted to public money including your cash. And holding back that cash is how you fight back, Jay Latimer, the pen name of the Duke alumnus, wrote for American Thinker on July 5.
“Colleges may hate conservatives, but they will be forced to listen – and change – if you target their pocketbooks. And colleges and universities are vulnerable, especially with the current double-whammy of lower student enrollment and the coronavirus taking its toll,” Latimer wrote.
Latimer outlined several ways conservatives can wield the power of the purse.
“Every alumnus should write to their college ASAP to state that not a single penny will be given until things change significantly. This is your chance to be heard, so let them have it with both barrels! [Latimer’s letter to Duke can be read below]. In fact, go it one better and tell them that you will do your best to convince other alumni to stop donating as well. We are in an ideological war – you need to show them whose side you are on.”
Halt Student Loan Guarantees
“The higher education system is kept afloat by a sea of student loan debt, much of it guaranteed by the Federal Government. This amounts to a huge subsidy, estimated at $100 to $250 billion per year, funded by our tax dollars. It’s long past time to stop this madness – let the universities compete in the marketplace without these kinds of perverse incentives (and watch those Diversity Deans collect pink slips).”
Tax the Endowments
“Again, hit them in the pocketbook. Why should Harvard not pay a penny of taxes on its $40+ billion endowment? It’s always irked me that someone like Elizabeth Warren can rant about businesses ‘paying their fair share of taxes’ while taking a high six-figure salary from an uber-rich institution that doesn’t pay any taxes at all. Tax them now!”
Latimer’s letter to Duke
To: Office of Gift Planning, Duke University
CC: Duke President Vincent E. Price
I am very sorry to have to write you this letter, but I feel I no longer have any choice.
As you know I was considering a major donation to Duke University. However, after learning of President Price’s “structural racism” initiatives, I will no longer be donating to Duke. In fact, I will make it my priority to convince other alumni not to donate as well.
I am shocked and appalled to see the direction that Duke University has chosen to take. I am ashamed to be a Duke alumnus, and am worried and indeed horrified at what this once great institution is becoming.
President Price’s recent announcement to go all-in on a “structural racism” ideology insures that Duke will become a place where racial grievances are magnified, and where people are judged and rewarded based on the color of their skin and actions of their ancestors. Ironically this kind of ideology is the very definition of racism, and the polar opposite of Martin Luther King’s vision for a color-blind society.
This radical “anti-bias” ideology is anathema to higher learning, and barely existed a decade ago. And yet President Price now wants to “ensure every student leaves Duke with an understanding of the nature of structural racism.”
This is indoctrination, pure and simple. It is no different than what was seen in China’s Cultural Revolution. Force feeding any kind of ideology – much less a newly created, radical one – does not belong in a free society, much less in a supposed bastion of higher learning.
I wonder, will an allowance be made for those students who do not wish to be “trained” in such a racially-charged ideology? I’m guessing not – like the victims of Communist dictatorships, they will be made to obey whether they like it or not.
The philosophical underpinnings of “structural racism” are also deeply ignorant. Students of history recognize that slavery and inequities have been a part of the human experience for millennia. Simplistic slogans attacking “white privilege” ignore this background (in fact the very word “slave” is derived from the Slavic peoples – who are now ironically lumped in with the oppressors).
The Duke University I knew and loved is long gone, destroyed by radicals seeking political power at the expense of free speech and learned discussion.
This is a travesty.