MOBILE DEVICES
Free Headline Alerts     
Worldwide Web WorldTribune.com

  breaking... 


Friday, May 7, 2010     GET REAL

Report: An independent Western Sahara state could fall to Al Qaida

WASHINGTON — The United States has been urged not to press Morocco to grant independence to the disputed territory of North Africa.

ShareThis

The Foreign Policy Research Institute said in a report that independence for Western Sahara could result in a failed state dominated by Al Qaida. In the report, authored by Harvey Sicherman, the institute said the status quo on Western Sahara could mark the best interim solution.

"Morocco will not yield the territory nor can it be in U.S. interests to facilitate the creation of a failed state at the expense of its Moroccan ally," the report, titled "A Note on the Western Sahara, said.


Also In This Edition



The report outlined the stalemate between Morocco and Polisario in United Nations mediation over the last five years. Polisario, sponsored by Algeria, has been controlling about 20 percent of the desert region or an estimated 155,000 people.

"Morocco's next move may be a unilateral imposition of autonomy, although so long as negotiations are afoot with the United States and the EU support, Rabat is unlikely to act," the report said.

Sicherman said Polisario has been able to recruit international aid for the refugee camps in Tindouf. In contrast, Morocco has paid for the administration of its 80 percent of Western Sahara.

"As for the Polisario-controlled refugees, the international donors are weary, less money is available and other, more demanding natural disasters are more compelling," the report, released in April 2010, said. "Thus, both sides have economic pressures for change."

The report pointed to declining support for the establishment of an independent entity in Western Sahara. Sicherman said the European Union and United States were concerned of another sanctuary for Al Qaida.

"As the terrorist preference for sanctuaries in weak or failed states has developed apace, the idea of a Polisario republic grows more and more dubious," the report said. "The last thing the world or Africa needs is yet another dependent, inept, and chaotic territory pretending to be a state."

So far, the report said, the United States has not changed its policy toward Western Sahara. The administration of President Barack Obama was said to have followed its predecessor in encouraging negotiations with Polisario rather than imposing Rabat's autonomy plan.

"The United States continues to work with Morocco and other Maghreb states on common interests; advocates a quick settlement of the Sahara problem; and encourages negotiations over the autonomy plan," the report said.




Comments


We need to know first if this new attitude of the White House is official and not another piece of media inventiveness. I am a Moroccan and I can assure you that the Moroccan people and not just the King or government feel strongly about this issue. There is no way a group of corrupt and failed politicians such as those supported by Algeria left stranded from the times of the Cold War can force Morocco to cede a part of our integral territory. Let Obama give away Alaska or New Mexico if he will. But Moroccan Sahara is and will remain Moroccan. Wait and hear the King's speech in about a month's time. Moroccans are united in ending this conflict by peaceful means. We call on the international community to force the Polisario to allow the detained Sahraoui population in Tindouf to join their country of origin. Why isn't there a UN official census in Polisario camps? Why so many former Polisario leaders came back to Morocco and call for the end of this conflict in which Algerian military government at high cost to their own people played and continue to play a destructive role?

Said Salhi      12:59 p.m. / Sunday, July 11, 2010


To Kristine: Whether you like it or not, Morocco has been a staunch ally of the United States for centuries. Thinking that the Moroccan people will accept being governed by a fundamentalist government shows that you don't know Moroccans. Algeria's experience is still in everybody's minds... With regards to freedom, I dare you to honestly compare freedom in Morocco (including in Laayoune) and in the Polisario camps or Algeria. And the parallel you're trying to make between Morocco and Nazi-Germany is simply shameful.

Zarni      9:49 a.m. / Saturday, May 8, 2010


Talking about a failing state: The Moroccan annexation of the Western Sahara is not approved by the International Court of Justice. Morocco does not want to follow the rule of international law. Amnesty International reports on Morocco are alarming and the freedom of the press is a problematic issue. Morocco has border disputes with all it's neighbors. It is a main exporter of drugs to Europe. Not to mention the Moroccan connection to all kind of terror attacks in Europe. This dictatorship may be an ally in the eyes of CIA torture experts but it is not one for the democratic world.

M. van Kaas      7:45 a.m. / Saturday, May 8, 2010


Kristine: What the author is trying to explain is that Morocco although not perfect, is still by far the front leader in openess towards the Western World in a region full of militaristic dictatorships. Another failed state could distabilze the whole region and its European neighbours...we don't want that now do we?

Jeff      1:56 a.m. / Saturday, May 8, 2010


TO Kristine: Sorry but you are out of subject. Do your homework properly and comment again. Tell me when there was a state called Western Sahara? Never heard of it before. Polisario is an entity that was created by Algeria, during the Soviet Union era, to fight Morocco so that they can have access to the Atlantic.

AR      11:53 p.m. / Friday, May 7, 2010


Why would anyone think of Morocco as stable western Ally? What a joke. But I guess free trade is in today's world more important than freedom? This is a monarchy with Islam as state-religion. It poses the same threat of islamic fundamentalism as other states with Islam as state-religion. The actions taken by their government against the "village of hope" in March showed this more than clearly. Should we have allowed Nazi-Germany to hold on to annexed Poland, because they had better finances and control? Since when do we choose a controlled monarchy with state religion over a maybe struggling chance for freedom and democracy?

Kristine      6:52 p.m. / Friday, May 7, 2010

About Us     l    Contact Us     l    Geostrategy-Direct.com     l    East-Asia-Intel.com
Copyright © 2010    East West Services, Inc.    All rights reserved.