Free Headline Alerts     
Worldwide Web


Thursday, March 19, 2009

Update: Israel's chief of staff comes home early after doors close in Obama's Washington

WASHINGTON — Israeli Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi cut short his visit to Washington after getting an extraordinarily cool reception from the new U.S. administration.


Last year, Israeli Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi had no problem setting up meetings with top officials in the U.S. government.

On his current trip to Washington, Ashkenazi sought to meet the administration of President Barack Obama, but most officials were unavailable.

A statement to by the Israel Defense Forces spokesman attempted to downplay the snubs. But diplomatic sources said Ashkenazi failed to obtain access to any Cabinet member, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates. The Israeli military chief, who sought to discuss the Iranian nuclear threat, was also unable meet his counterpart, Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Also In This Edition

[On March 19, the Israel Defense Forces spokesman e-mailed the following statement to "The schedule for the United States visit of the IDF Chief of the General Staff, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, was preplanned according to requests made by American officials. Any meetings that were cancelled were substituted with telephone conference calls."]

The IDF Internet site reported on March 17, that Ashkenazi cut short his trip to the United States in order to participate in a security cabinet meeting regarding the abducted soldier Gilad Shalit.

"The Chief of the General Staff wishes to send his sincere apologies to the 1500 senior donors of the Friends of the IDF in the United States, who will gather for their annual donation gala dinner in New York City on Tuesday night (Mar. 17), in which Lt. Gen. Ashkenazi was supposed to participate as a guest of honor," the IDF report stated.

On March 12, Ashkenazi left for a five-day visit to the United States meant to lobby the Obama administration to abandon the planned U.S. dialogue with Iran, Middle East Newsline reported. Ashkenazi, scheduled to meet with the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, was expected to have brought new Israeli intelligence on Iran's nuclear weapons and missile programs.

But the diplomatic sources said the administration made it clear that nobody in a policy-making position was available to sit with Ashkenazi. This included the president, Vice President Joseph Biden, Gates, National Intelligence director Dennis Blair or Mullen.

["With regards to a meeting with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, one was not scheduled between Lt. Gen. Ashkenazi and Adm. Mullen," the IDF stated. "Lt. Gen. Ashkenazi has met with Adm. Mullen five times in the past year."]

"The administration is sending a very clear message to Israel, and this is we want to talk about Palestine and not Iran," a diplomat who has been following U.S.-Israel relations said.

Ashkenazi obtained an appointment with National Security Advisor James Jones. But the sources said the meeting was to focus on U.S. demands for Israel to ease military restrictions in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

"The Obama administration believes that Israel is as much or more of a problem as it is an ally, at least until Israel's disagreements with its neighbors are resolved," former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, said.

Bolton envisioned that the White House would pressure Israel to legitimize Hamas and Hizbullah. At the same time, he said, Obama would continue to woo Iran.

Already, economic and diplomatic advisers to Obama have urged the president to launch a U.S. dialogue with Hamas. The US/Middle East Project, which includes such Obama supporters as former Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Sen. Chuck Hagel, was said to have elicited a promise from Obama to listen to any proposals made by Hamas.

"The main gist is that you need to push hard on the Palestinian peace process," former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft said. "Don't move it to the end of your agenda and say you have too much to do. And the U.S. needs to have a position, not just hold their coats while they sit down."

The Israeli chief of staff had also scheduled a session with Dennis Ross, the special adviser on Iran to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. But the sources said Ross was not regarded as being in a policy-making role.

The diplomatic sources said the White House and the senior echelon of the Obama administration have refused a dialogue with Israel on the Iranian threat. They said Ms. Clinton, during her visit to Israel, was largely silent during briefings by Israeli intelligence on Iran's nuclear and missile programs.

During her visit, Ms. Clinton received written recommendations on U.S. policy toward Iran from Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni. The U.S. secretary said the recommendations would be relayed to the White House.

"The Israeli government and military have been alarmed by the rapid and dramatic reversal in the U.S. policy toward Iran," the source said. "This reversal took place without any consultation with Israel, Gulf Arab countries or even Congress."

The sources said Israel has sought a U.S. commitment to limit its dialogue with Iran. Israel has also urged Obama to make it clear that the military option against Iran's nuclear program exists.

But Obama and his top aides appear uninterested in hearing Israel's position. The sources said a key aim of Ashkenazi was to urge the administration to release weapons and systems long sought by Israel in the area of aerial refueling, air-to-ground weapons, sensors as well as the F-22 fighter-jet.

In 2008, under the Bush administration, Gates and then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice blocked U.S. requests for these military systems. The sources said Gates and Ms. Rice concluded that Israel could use this equipment for an air strike on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities.

"Ashkenazi sees this U.S. refusal as what has been undermining Israeli deterrence toward Iran and boosting the confidence of the Teheran regime," the source said. "The mullahs in regime have concluded that America has dropped the military option and won't allow such an option to Israel."


While strong, Israel is in grave danger if the U.S. signals weak support! Such a signal would betray Israel and embolden terrorists.

D. grant Chee      11:11 p.m. / Sunday, March 22, 2009

"I will bless those who bless you, and curse those who curse you." Turning our back on Israel and trying to force them to give away land that is rightfully theirs is a huge mistake. Gaza and the West Bank belongs to Israel. The Palestinians have a homeland, its called Jordan.

Jeff Calvert      1:33 p.m. / Sunday, March 22, 2009

Israel can and will handle itself very well. Remember the 6 day war? Remember when all their neighbors attacked them the day after their status as a nation was confirmed? They annilated their massive enemies and took lands rightfully theirs anyway. They were massively outnumbered yet wiped the floor with their aggressors. God defends Israel and America will pay a huge price if it goes too far with its hostile and hypocritical attitude towards Israel.

Daniel      9:25 p.m. / Saturday, March 21, 2009

Israel needs to cut her dependency on the U.S., ask their G-d to help them, then go do what must be done. The same G-d who parted the Red Sea is still there to help them, if they will only wake up and acknowledge their need of Him.

Nancy      9:25 p.m. / Saturday, March 21, 2009

What a disappointment. I was thinking that USA is a source of good in this world - before beliefs, before religion, before interests. I think USA must obligate itself to democracy! With great power comes great responsibility. Israel is a democracy under continuous attack from dozens of states that want to see us destroyed. And still we are the bad guys?!

Yoav      7:50 a.m. / Saturday, March 21, 2009

Israel is quasi-independent state because it is very dependent on foreign aid. As such, the state technically can act alone without America's approval but that would be an unforgivable act as far as the USA is concerned. The only attack Israel can conduct would be a nuclear one which is off the table. Conventional attack on Iran is nearly impossible and too costly for Israel to undertake without U.S. backing.

Dave      5:53 p.m. / Friday, March 20, 2009

It doesn't matter. Just like blacks in America, it doesn't matter how baddly Democrats treat Jews. They will still vote Democrat on election day. And Jews are supposed to be smart?!

Bob A      4:17 p.m. / Friday, March 20, 2009

Re: "however, it will [Israel] alone and ALONE it shall bear the devastating consequences of an Iranian reprisal." Thanks for reminding us. Better to risk the reprisal (likely useless) than the "devastating consequences" of an Iranian first strike. AHasta la vista, Iran.

Joe Meric      2:05 p.m. / Friday, March 20, 2009

It is an utter nonsense that the U.S. is preventing Israel from attacking Iran. Israel (at least under the UN) is a sovereign country. It can attack if it wishes to; however, it will alone and ALONE it shall bear the devastating consequences of an Iranian reprisal. The U.S. will not fight the Israeli regime's wars.

Abbas Khalil      11:59 p.m. / Thursday, March 19, 2009

About Us     l    Contact Us     l     l
Copyright © 2009    East West Services, Inc.    All rights reserved.