Worldwide Web

  Commentary . . .

Lev Navrozov Archive
Thursday, September 24, 2009

Can Obama's nuke-free-world save the U.S from China's biological weapons?

Lev Navrozov emigrated from the Soviet Union in 1972. His columns are today read in both English and Russian. To learn more about Mr. Navrozov's work with the Center for the Survival of Western Democracies, click here.

In my previous column I described how General Chi Haotian of China predicted, in his address to the top Chinese generals and officers, China's annihilation of one-third or two-thirds of Americans by biological weapons and the transfer of their homes and property to the new (Chinese) inhabitants of America.


Also In This Edition

Evidently, Obama has never read Chi Haotian's speeches. Therefore he has come out with the old idea: What if the countries having nuclear weapons agree to give them away for destruction? This has never happened. But now that Obama has been elected the U.S. president by those voters who had never heard of Chi Haotian. . . . Hence those voters and he must believe that it is possible to do today what was not done 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 years ago for the lack of a politician as wise as Obama.

But why is Obama fixated on nuclear weapons? Chi wants to kill Americans by biological weapons, which is cheaper than to destroy all buildings in the country by nuclear bombs. Besides, the homes and other property of the killed Americans are to be passed over to the new settlers in America the superior race: the Chinese.

Also, today everyone (except Obama?) knows that nano weapons surpass in many ways nuclear weapons.

His first report on his nuclear-free world Obama made on April 6, 2009. In the more than five months ever since the project has not budged. The first response on 9/5/2009 (Facebook, which specializes in responses) is this:

    Just more lies 12:52 a.m., April 6, 2009. There's no way this clown is getting rid of nuclear weapons. Are you kidding? N-Korea just tossed off a small long-range missile from their island capable of reaching N-America and you are going to get rid of N-weapons. Not to mention some rogue middle-eastern states that are preparing to arm themselves. Nuclearly. Come on, Obama, just stop lying to us all!!! My sides are hurting!!!

Two countries have the greatest number of strategic nuclear warheads: Russia (2,800) and the U.S.A. (2,200). Next come France (300), China (180), and UK (160). Finally come Israel (60), Pakistan (60), India (60), and North Korea (<10).

Well, will Russia be willing to give up its nuclear weapons? But suppose Russia had them in 1940. Then the nonaggression treaty and general Russia-German friendship would not have been violated by Hitler on June 22, 1941.

Today China figures to those in power in Russia like Nazi Germany in the 1940s. But Russia, given its population against the 1.331 billion Chinese, can only survive due to its vast superiority in nuclear weapons.

What about the United States? The same reason: The only way to survive is a nuclear counterblow against China's biological weapons.

As for the other owners of nuclear weapons, their total number of strategic nuclear warheads is smaller than that of Russia or the U.S.A.

Incidentally, except for the beginning of WW1, no biological and other such weapons were used for ethical reasons. Even Hitler (a notorious mass murderer) prohibited their production! Yet they can cause more human deaths per the same cost than can nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons will be destroyed in all nuclear countries? Einstein drew Roosevelt's attention to them in 1939, that is, 70 years ago. What if biological weapons outstrip nuclear weapons in the number of human deaths per the same cost?

Can a U.S. president cope with such problems? The American "revolutionary" war against Britain in the 18th century led to the election of a U.S. president by a majority of voters, which rules out the necessary ability of the person thus elected, and hence the last three U.S. presidents Obama, George W. Bush, and Clinton were at the mental level of most of their voters, that is, mostly mediocrities, for dozens of millions of voters are mostly mediocrities by definition, and they elect a mediocrity.

The United States has survived against weapons of the 20th century because it has been protected by two oceans and Canada and because the United States was the first, owing to Einstein, to develop nuclear weapons. It is justly said that no modern war took place in the United States after England decided that it was impossible to carry supplies to their troops in America across the Atlantic Ocean. But today's (Nazi) China threatens the United States with biological weapons, as Chi Haotian explains in detail in his speeches.

Well, imagine that a majority of the American population are still illiterate (cannot read) and hence the U.S. president they have elected is illiterate too. He cannot read Chi in English. He won't understand what is going on until infected, as are millions of other Americans, by Chinese biological weapons and dying, to "clean" America for the Chinese superior race.  

Lev Navrozov can be reached by e-mail at To learn more about and support his work at the Center for the Survival of Western Democracies, click here. If you intend to make a tax-exempt donation to the non-profit Center, please let us know via e-mail at, and we will send you all relevant information. Thank you.

About Us     l    Contact Us     l     l
Copyright © 2008    East West Services, Inc.    All rights reserved.