Special to WorldTribune.com

TEL AVIV — Leading Israeli analysts have failed to agree on strategy
toward the Palestinian Authority.

Although most of the analysts warned against the U.S. campaign to
establish a Palestinian state in the West Bank in 2014, they could not agree
on an Israeli alternative.

Some of the analysts urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to formulate an interim solution to the West Bank while others said relations with the PA would continue to mark a conflict that must be managed.

“Netanyahu is going through the same syndrome as did Begin, Rabin, Sharon, and Olmert,” Shmuel Sandler, the deputy director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Affairs, said. “He wants to stake a place for himself in the chronicles of the Jewish state as a contributor to a peace process.”

The center conducted a recent roundtable discussion on the Israeli-Palestinian process, which the United States wants completed by early 2014. One of the analysts said the negotiations have been complicated by the insistence of President Barack Obama to link this with Iran’s nuclear program.

“Obama, with absolutely no reasonable basis, combines the
Israeli-Palestinian issue with the American-Iranian file,” Mordechai Kedar,
who also consults with Israel’s government and military, said. “This way
Obama can show his face in public as someone who had at least one success in
the Mideast, after his failures in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Syria and
more.”

Kedar, a specialist on the Arab world, warned Netanyahu against
establishing a Palestinian state. Instead, Kedar, who dismissed the prospect
of an agreement with the PA, said Israel should offer what he termed an
“eight-state solution.”

“This involves the establishment of a council of Palestinian emirates or
mini-states based on the sociology of the different clans and tribes in
Gaza, Judea and Samaria [West Bank],” Kedar said. “This will give Arab
leadership a firm local base with a traditional and homogenous sociological
foundation.”

The analysts also disagreed over Israel’s strategic position. Several of
the analysts, including center director Efraim Inbar, said Israel, despite
threats of Western sanctions, was becoming stronger economically and
militarily.

But others said Netanyahu was driven by his fear of a crisis with Obama.
They said time was working against Israel.

“Israel’s legitimacy is a strategic asset,” Joshua Teitelbaum said. “It
is getting harder and harder to convince even Israel’s supporters of the
legitimacy of expanded Jewish settlement in areas that are still under
negotiation for the establishment of a possible Palestinian state.”

  Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Affairs, Jewish settlements, Palestinian state, Peace with the Palestinians? Israeli debaters agree only that Obama and Netanyahu are dreaming