World Tribune.com

Congress signals interest in bills limiting U.S.-Saudi ties

SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Thursday, July 18, 2002

WASHINGTON Ñ House and Senate members said they might examine new initiatives meant to restructure U.S. relations with the kingdom during the next session of Congress. They said this could include legislation to end weapons sales to Saudi Arabia.

Such legislation had been introduced during the current congressional session. But it was withdrawn under heavy pressure from the Bush administration.

Last week, Rep. Ron Paul, a Texas Republican, withdrew an amendment that would cut arms sales to Saudi Arabia, Middle East Newsline reported. The amendment did not have the support of the House International Relations Committee.

Paul said his amendment was meant to deem Saudi Arabia Ñ which he said funded Islamic insurgency attacks against the United States Ñ as a country that is not fully cooperating with the U.S.-led war on terrorism. He cited the 15 Saudi nationals who carried out the suicide attacks on New York and Washington on Sept. 11 as well as the large number of Saudi members of Al Qaida captured in Afghanistan.

"It doesn't put on embargoes," Paul said of his amendment. "And it is not nearly like designating a nation as a state sponsor of terrorism. But it does mean that we wouldn't sell weapons to that particular country. And it would make the point that we don't think they're cooperating enough."

Rep. Tom Lantos, a California Democrat, said Congress would return to examine U.S.-Saudi relations and consider legislation to restrict weapons sales to the kingdom. Lantos said Riyad has prevented the U.S. Air Force from using Prince Sultan Air Base for Persian Gulf military operations.

"So political correctness has changed as I'm sure my friend from Texas [Paul] understands," Lantos said. "And speaking for this side of the aisle, we will be very happy to look at amendments and resolutions involving Saudi Arabia. This has been a one-way relationship for too long. And it is an outrage that the most modern and up-to-date military facility in the region apparently would not be made available for our use in case hostilities were to arise in that region."

Print this Article Print this Article Email this article Email this article Subscribe to this Feature Free Headline Alerts
Google
Search Worldwide Web Search WorldTribune.com Search WorldTrib Archives

See current edition of Geostrategy-Direct.com

Return to World Tribune.com Front Cover