It came to be noticed 25 years ago that China was "developing," as Britain once was, followed by Russia, ending with Stalin's industrialization and defeat of Nazi Germany.
About a decade ago, it became clear to the West that the world had changed. It was realized that a country's size of its population may be the cause not of its backwardness but on the contrary of its military superiority via "industrialization." Sociopolitically, China was a slave state like Stalin's Russia. China's "industrialization" was now dangerous to the free countries.
The military development of China has not worried many Americans enough even in the past ten years. An American who asked me not to publish his e-mail (sent 1/29/2010) and hence not to disclose his name, writes that my column, referring to the growing danger of China, "splendidly spoiled" his "good mood."
"You and your obsession with freedom, give it up already, would you? Ach! Give me my MTV and American idol, I must feel good again!!!"
The impression is that I am the owner of the U.S.A. — a figure like Stalin, Hitler, or Mao, or Mao's sociopolitical inheritors, and hence I have forced this American to read my column, which (oh, horror of horrors!) spoiled his good mood! But surely as long as freedom exists in the U.S.A., an American can read or not read anything or anyone. Similarly, no American can forbid me to be or not to be obsessed with freedom. On the other hand, if the People's Republic of China extends its slave state to the U.S.A., my reader may end up not with "MTV and American idol" but with death in a torture chamber, to give an example understandable to an American who has seen at least one movie showing a torture chamber.
Those Americans who believe that in Stalin's Russia or in Hitler's Germany or in the China of Mao and of those after him, there was or is freedom, and so everyone can choose the columnist according to his or her taste, are ignorant or innocent like a child of two or three, who has never been allowed to see on television an X-rated movie, a "movie for adults."
Google, which originated later than Yahoo, has refused to enter a deal with the owners of China to let itself censored, and hence has to leave China, unless my news is outdated. In answer to my search "China's military plans," Google produced 48,700,000 results. But how many Americans have read even one of them?
The logic of China's plans for its world domination is as simple as was the logic of Stalin or Hitler. It is safer to conquer the world than to keep the population of China in slavery, with the free world tempting the population of China with its freedom. About 100 revolts happen every year in China, but in contrast to Tiananmen, they are successfully concealed from the outside world.
One of Google's results in answer to my search was that in China (in 2007) 50 million males from 9 to 18 years of age were drafted for military training, including self-defense and handling advanced weaponry.
Just think of it: 50 million! Not all "developed countries" have 50 million as their total population. Even today, 2 or 3 million people make up a large army in the United States — or the "official army" in China. Now, the total population of China is 1,331 billion people, and 50 million of new recruits (in 2007) could only be just a beginning!
We can foresee China's world war to establish its world domination. Hitler dreamed of it after he routed France within six weeks and before he was routed in Stalin's Russia and committed suicide.
In his speeches going back to 2004 and 2005, General Chi, Minister of National Defense of China between 1993 and 2003 and then a top military official (he is 80 years old), described how China would attack the United States first, for the victory over the United States would, in his opinion, mean the victory over the rest of the world as well.
There is one noteworthy detail. From one-third to two-thirds of Americans will be gassed or infected with a terminal disease, and their property, including their homes, passed over to the Chinese, who (the superior race!) will be new settlers in the former (inferior race!) United States. The American experts found this part of Chi's projection of the war especially fantastic (possibly invented by Lev Navrozov in his column).
Actually, the above was a standard method of a slave state to stimulate its slave soldiers. What could be more attractive for Chinese slave soldiers than to get, as payment for their work, from one-third to two-thirds of property in the United States for their seizure of the United States! The most advanced industrialization must combine with the oldest ways of using humans. Let the slaves rob the country they had seized!
There is nothing historically new about Stalin's Russia, Hitler's Germany, or Mao's China, now owned by his successors. Freedom is much newer, and it disappears much easier than state slavery, which is now called by the West "totalitarianism" — quite respectfully, for the free West has been having commercial, cultural, technological, and other relations with slave states.