Lev Navrozov Archive

The 21st-century Obama-Mao slavery 'partnership

Imagine Hitler's ornament on Christmas tree in the British Parliament before Hitler began trying to conquer England, but instead invaded Stalin's Russia in 1941, which led to his debacle and suicide. Well, if Churchill's predecessor, Prime Minister Chamberlain, had played, with respect to the "new" Germany, established by Hitler, the same role Obama has been playing with respect to the "new" China, established by Mao, Chamberlain would have been sentenced to death as a traitor, and Churchill would have been approved.

But how did Churchill himself become the Prime Minister? Churchill had been arguing that the "new" Germany presented the mortal danger to England and other free countries. He had a small audience. But when Hitler resumed his invasions, it became clear to more people that he was right, while his numberless opponents, including Chamberlain, were wrong. At this point, let me quote my Britannica, volume 5, page 750:

"On May 10, 1940… Chamberlain resigned [because Hitler had shown his true colors]… and advised the king to call Churchill to be prime minister. … On May 13 [that is, within three days!] Churchill faced the House of Commons for the first time as prime minister. The Commons gave him a unanimous vote of confidence."

In the United States, the U.S. President is elected by a majority of psychiatrically healthy adults. This means that Churchill would have never been elected because a majority of the English people did not know what he was writing and talking about. He contended (and now, 70 years later, we see that he was correct!) that Hitler meant the return of all mankind, including Europe and the United States, to what I call "slavery," since it would be wrong to drop ugly names in the belief that the ugly realitlies they denote will thus also disappear. Obama believes, as well as did Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, that slavery (with them as global slave owners) is the beautiful future of mankind, except that it will be called by some new beautiful word, like the word "communism" in 1917, which actually denoted a utopia, meaning that there will be no money, and everyone will have free whatever he or she wants.

To elect Obama was the same as to elect any other American understandable to most Americans-a majority of voters. Since a majority in every country consists mainly of mediocrities, why elect incomprehensible Churchill if it is possible to elect Obama, whom any other Obama understands? If the prime minister in England had been "elected by a majority of voters," Chamberlain, not Churchill, would have become prime minister in 1940 and the world would have become slavery, with Hitler as the global slave-owner-in-chief.

Today the situation is more dangerous than ever. For the first time, science and technology belong not to small nations (even Stalin's Russia was a small nation, compared to China) but to a nation whose population accounts for about one-fifth of mankind and which is four times larger than that of the United States.

At last, the project of Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, and Mao Tse-tung seems feasible, and the fact that the U.S. President has become a voluntary warrior among the warriors for beautiful world slavery is perhaps significant.

This brings us again to the question whether freedom helps itself to survive or becomes a source of its own self-annihilation.

Freedom saved freedom in the 1940s, since it is owing to freedom that a German named Einstein could travel to the United States and persuade Roosevelt to begin developing "the atom bomb," which thus appeared in the United States before Hitler's "atom bomb," which would be able to make the world a world of slavery and him, Hitler, the world slave-owner-in-chief.

But freedom also enables millions of people like Obama to become with impunity voluntary traitors to their own country, that is, to freedom. Marx and Lenin used freedom to teach how to destroy freedom and thus become happy. Hitler enjoyed Wagner, but he never cared that in his utopian slavery there would be no composers as remarkable as Wagner. It is possible that death as horrible as the death of Kamenev, Zinoviev, or Bukharin is awaiting Obama as well. Well, Hitler never thought that he would have to commit suicide to escape the Russians, who entered Berlin, along with their secret police.  

Comments