MOBILE DEVICES
Free Headline Alerts     
Worldwide Web WorldTribune.com

  breaking... 


Thursday, December 24, 2009     GET REAL

Report: Israel believed UN assurances before Lebanon pullout

WASHINGTON Ñ Israel ignored warnings by its European intermediaries that a unilateral withdrawal from Lebanon would lead to the takeover by the Iranian-sponsored Hizbullah of the border with the Jewish state.   

A Swedish intermediary involved in a backchannel negotiation between Israel and Hizbullah said he had warned the government of then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak that any withdrawal from southern Lebanon must be accompanied by the return of the central government in Beirut. But the intermediary said the government, primarily then-minister Yossi Beilin, ignored the warning.

"These warnings were not heeded, however Ñ although the withdrawal itself was carried out relatively quickly and painlessly," the intermediary, Magnus Norell, said. "Hizbullah did in fact assume control over the south."


Also In This Edition


Norell said Israel ignored the warnings of the European intermediaries. He said Israel "bet" on assurances from the international community, particularly the United Nations, to supervise southern Lebanon. Instead, the UN was said to have dismissed proposals to bolster its peace-keeping force in the south.

"The summer 2006 war was therefore expected, even if its timing was uncertain," Norell said.

The assertion was part of a report authored by Norell for the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. For the first time, Norell, in a report titled "A Victory for Islamism: The Second Lebanon War and its Repercussions," outlined a three-year effort by Israel to win Hizbullah's agreement to a withdrawal from southern Lebanon in exchange for a pledge by the militia to halt attacks on the Jewish state.

Norell, a senior analyst at Swedish Defense Research Agency, said he worked with Magnus Ranstorp, then a researcher at St. Andrews University in Scotland, to form a channel for secret contacts between Israel and Hizbullah. The channel operated from 1997 through 2000 as the two Europeans relayed messages between Israel and Hizbullah.

Throughout the talks, Norell said, Israel was challenged by the prospect of a Hizbullah takeover of southern Lebanon. He said Israel understood that the Beirut government would require assistance to control the south and end Hizbullah dominance.

"That the power vacuum arising from an Israeli withdrawal would lead to a Hizbullah takeover was plain to see," Norell recalled. "At the time, however, Syrian forces still occupied parts of Lebanon, and it was equally obvious that the Lebanese government would not be able to reclaim the south while Damascus backed Hizbullah and worked against any initiatives that did not take Syrian interests into account. This was the message that the author and Dr. Ranstorp brought back from encounters with Lebanese interlocutors."

Norell said the initiative for the backchannel with Israel came from Beilin, then regarded as a leading strategist in the ruling Labor Party. Beilin had long argued for a unilateral Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, assuring audiences that Hizbullah would then end attacks on the Jewish state.

"As for the secret contacts preceding the 2000 withdrawal, their purpose had been to investigate the consequences of a unilateral move out of the Israeli security zone established in southern Lebanon in 1978," Norell said. "The initiative came from Israeli politician Yossi Beilin, who for several years had argued within the Labor Party in favor of such a move."

In wake of the Israeli withdrawal, Israel failed to maintain deterrence against Hizbullah. Norell cited Israel's mild response to Hizbullah's attacks on the Israeli border within weeks of the withdrawal.

"The result of this incident Ñ and the Israeli response Ñ was that Hizbullah and Hamas realized that this kind of attack could pay off and that Israel was not likely to react very strongly to relatively 'small' incidents." Norell said.

Norell said Israel's unilateral withdrawal from Lebanon paved the way for Hizbullah to turn from a militia into a fully-fledged military. He said the Lebanese Army, with 70 percent of its privates being Shi'ites, would not confront Hizbullah.

"It is a regular army, complete with its own uniforms, communications network, and arms stockpiles," Norell said. "It is completely beyond the control of any government institution. The Lebanese army's loss of credibility may prove difficult to repair."



About Us     l    Contact Us     l    Geostrategy-Direct.com     l    East-Asia-Intel.com
Copyright © 2009    East West Services, Inc.    All rights reserved.