Is health care expert Obama aware that U.S. 'partner' killed tens of millions of its own?
Thursday, August 13, 2009 E-Mail this story Free Headline Alerts
At a two-day meeting in Washington hosted by President Obama for Chinese top officials, he addressed diplomats and correspondents from both countries assembled in the vast Ronald Reagan Hall. Obama announced that ÒU.S.-China relationsÓ will ÔshapeÕ the 21st century.Ó Or: ÒI believe that we [the U.S. and the PeopleÕs Republic of China] are poised to make steady progress in some of the most important issues of our times.Ó
Was the meeting a happy accident? The Jamestown Foundation sends me its interesting periodical reports (in particular, from China), and the report of 02/20/2009 (that is, only a month since Obama was sworn into office) starts as follows:
Beijing has unleashed an unprecedented diplomatic blitz. . . . For the first time, both Chinese State President Hu Jintao and Vice-President Xi Jinping were on trips abroad earlier this month. . . .
So the United States and the PeopleÕs Republic of China will be helping each other and the rest of the world to Òmake steady progress in some of the most important issues of our time.Ó
Coincidentally, on July 29, I saw Obama on CNN explaining to an audience the innovations he proposes in American health care.
The principle of health care for a lady or a gentleman in ancient Athens or in the U.S.A. today is basically the same. An Athenian lady or gentleman is ill and sees a doctor of her or his choice. In countries such as post-1949 China, it is those who actually own the country that determine who will be treated medically by whom.
Since Obama expects the ÒpartnershipÓ between the U.S.A. and China to help each other and the rest of the world to Òmake steady progress in some of the most important issues of our timeÓ (such as health care), it is appropriate to ask whether Obama understands how different post-1949 China is from the U.S.A.
The goal of the owners of China is to cure sick people at a cost lower than their scientific, technological, and hence military value to the owners of China. Such people, highly valuable to the owners of China, are few. Most people are replaceable. Mao used to say that if 400 million Chinese die in the fight for Communism, the survivors will be able to build Communism.
The goal of the owners of China is to become the owners of the world. If they do, they will be up to their death at the peak of their power, glory, and wealth, and their children will follow suit. If they fail, they may be killed, as they killed. . . . About a decade ago, the owners of China showed the Falun Gong practitioners as Chinese exotica. But then the owners of China decided that they should be put to death.
The only way for the owners of China to own the world is to put to death the United States before the latter does this to the PeopleÕs Republic of China (see the declarations to this effect by General Chi Haotian, the Minister of National Defense of China from 1995 to 2003).
The owners of China will gain a lot from the PeopleÕs Republic of China and the United States being Òpartners.Ó
This is why the owners of China are so eager for ÒpartnershipÓ between the U.S.A. and the PeopleÕs Republic of China, which that same Chi Haotian extolled as a country populated by a race superior to to the German Nazis. This is why the PeopleÕs Republic of China deserves and will achieve world domination.
While the ÒpartnershipÓ with the U.S.A. (which is, after all, a democracy, not a slave state) will add enormous prestige to the PeopleÕs Republic of China, will this ÒpartnershipÓ gain the United States any prestige of the outside world?
Read what Obama has been saying. He may have a sharp sense of how a medical service is paid for and should be paid for in the United States. On the other hand, he possibly has never ever heard that Mao and Stalin killed (counting them together) one hundred million people without any legal formalities. But to the sociopolitically mature section of mankind, it is of paramount importance whether everyone in a country under discussion has legal defense or whether any number of its inhabitants can be killed by the owners of the country like so many flies.
Here in front of me is the Prepared Statement of C. Richard DÕAmato, Chairman, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Before the Canada Institute, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Friday, June 10, 2005.
In the first paragraph of this 12-page speech, we learn that ÒChina rise accelerates from a backward third-world nation Ñ which was its status only half-a-century ago Ñ to a world economic and political superpower.Ó
This reflects a common attitude, according to which all countries are divided into Òbackward third-world nationsÓ and Òeconomic and political superpowers.Ó Even after the appearance of StalinÕs Russia and HitlerÕs Germany, it was not generally understood that a country may be a military (and hence economic, scientific, and technological) superpower, but its inhabitants may have human rights no more than did the slaves owned by the slave-owning governments thousands of years ago.
As of 1933, Germany was no less developed than England economically, scientifically, and technologically. Yet its human rights were gone: politically, it was a slave state of antiquity, and Jews disappeared in it as could ÒaliensÓ in an ancient autocracy, while the German science and technology merely helped to accelerate the mass murder.
In other words, ChinaÕs rulersÕ perception of Obama and the United States is realistic: the ÒpartnershipÓ between Obama and the PeopleÕs Republic of China is necessary for ChinaÕs rulers to demolish the United States, the need for which the former Minister of National Defense of China Chi Haotian so ruthlessly proclaimed years ago. Now, ObamaÕs view of this ÒpartnershipÓ is an infantile utopia, based on his childish ignorance of what the PeopleÕs Republic of China is.