World Tribune.com


Warning: 'We do not have the most powerful weaponry on earth'


See the Lev Navrozov Archive

By Lev Navrozov
SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM

Lev Navrozov emigrated from the Soviet Union in 1972 He settled in New York City where he quickly learned that there was no market for his eloquent and powerful English language attacks on the Soviet Union. To this day, he writes without fear or favor or the conventions of polite society. He chaired the "Alternative to the New York Times Committee" in 1980, challenged the editors of the New York Times to a debate (which they declined) and became a columnist for the New York City Tribune. His columns are today read in both English and Russian.
Lev Navrozov

Monday, April 10, 2006

With rare exceptions, the inhabitants of the earth even today still do not understand Einstein's proposition that every point in space (such as an adjoining room in your apartment) has its own time: there is no time, but only time-space or space-time. Yet these "ravings of a madman" (Einstein was a clerk in a patents' office) were verified experimentally and thus became the truths told by a scientist of genius.

Einstein told these truths in 1905, that is, a century ago! Imagine today's jungle of ravings of madmen or truths told by scientists of genius! And imagine today's jungle of superweapons, which turn out, on further research, to be globally destructive or impossible!

The Invision Power Board (Online) posted on Jan. 7, 2005, an article headlined "Scalar Weaponry Makes Nukes A Thing of the Past." Nukes? No wonder! They were obtained and used in 1945, more than half a century ago! The article begins as follows: "Scalar weapons are electromagnetic waves emitted through a specially constructed radio antenna."

Then the floor is given to Thomas Bearden, whose scientific profile The Virtual Times, for which he writes, outlines as follows: Lieutenant Colonel U.S. Army (Retired). MS [Master of Science] Nuclear Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology. BS [Bachelor of Science] Mathematics, Northeast Louisiana University. Graduate of Command & General Staff College, U.S. Army. Graduate of Guided Missile Staff Officer's Course, U.S. Army (equivalent to MS in Aerospace Engineering). Numerous electronic warfare and counter-countermeasures courses. Tom is a leading conceptualist in alternate energy technology, mind/matter interaction, EM [electromagnetic] bioffects, paranormal phenomena, parapsychology, psychotronics, Tesla technology, and unified field theory concepts. He is the leading advocate of scalar potential electromagnetics, and has worked with several inventors involved in alternate energy devices and scalar electromagnetic system prototypes. He advanced the first force-free redefinition of mass as well as an electromagnetic mechanism that generates the flow of time, and has proposed a testable resolution of the century-old debate over the way in which energy flows in electrical circuits.

Enough? Thomas Bearden-who is possibly not just another Einstein, but is possibly another Leonardo da Vinci as well!-begins his survey of scalar weaponry-no, not even with today's China, but with Soviet Russia! For some time, Russia has possessed highly advanced "extended-electromagnetics" (energetics) weapons of a very novel kind, using a dramatically extended electrodynamics theory. . . . Most of these energetics weapons are more advanced than what had previously been known to the U.S. military, intelligence and scientific communities. . . . A major contributing factor holding back U.S. catch-up is that the flawed foundations of Maxwell's 1865 theory have not been changed by the Western scientific community.

As for China, Lt. Col. Bearden wrote (way back in 2002!): A sobering development that occurred earlier this year (2002) was China's deployment of both quantum potential (QP) weapons and negative energy electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons (a type we originally called the MindSnapper to disguise its true nature). The QP weapons are the dominant weapons on Earth today, followed closely by negative energy EMP weapons. . . . The U.S. is still well behind. . . ." (Fer De Lance [his book of 2002], pp. 4-5.)

The Invision Power Board concludes: This information is staggering, and completely backs up the desperate warning of Colonel Byron Weeks [USAF, Retired Reserve] last October 5. "America will burn," he says, "because we do not have the most powerful weaponry on earth."

I imagine how shocked will be those of my readers who write in their e-mails to me that I am simply not privy to the U.S. "black" projects, which are financed super-secretly, bypassing the Congress. Just as this is done in a dictatorship!

I answer that I know that out of its allocations for nanotechnology in general, with its numberless civilian or commercial fields, the U.S. Congress has publicly refused to allocate a cent to Drexler and the Foresight Institute (he founded in 1986). In his book of 1986, Drexler had contemplated molecular nano weapons, which may turn out to be infinitely more powerful than nuclear weapons.

So we are to believe that the "black" molecular nano weapons project has bypassed Drexler and the Foresight Institute he founded-Drexler et al. do not even know about any "black" project of development of molecular nano weapons!

This is as plausible as would have been the assertion from 1939 to 1945 that the nuclear Manhattan Project had bypassed the nuclear scientists of genius whom Einstein had mentioned in his letter of Aug. 2, 1939, to Roosevelt, and they did not even know about the "black" nuclear Manhattan Project in which certain unknown strangers they had never heard of were developing nuclear weapons.

These readers of mine believe that the U.S. science is by definition the world's most advanced, and the world's most advanced scientists are developing in "black" projects the world's most advanced weapons.

Why this faith in the infinite superiority of the U.S. science over the science in a dictatorship? Well, freedom is creative, and the lack of freedom suffocates talent and genius. True! For example, the Russian poetry of the first third of the 20th century was second to none. But under Stalin it wilted.

Yet in his interview way back in 1991 (!) in a magazine called "Megabrain Report" of Feb. 4, Lt. Col. Thomas E. Bearden has stipulated the following exception to the above noble rule: Contrary to the scientific propaganda, orthodox science is ruthless in defending its doctrine against all would-be heretics. Much of science has been converted to a religion, instead of a science. Any person knowledgeable of scientific history can cite numerous examples of scientific suppression, character assassination, and essentially banishment. Gauss's nonlinear geometry, Wegener's continental drift, Mayer's discovery of the conservation of energy, Ovshinsky's amorphous semiconductors . . . come readily to mind.

Why has the U.S. Congress publicly refused to allocate a cent to Drexler and the Foresight Institute he had founded? Those representing the commercial or civilian fields of nanotechnology cried out that Drexler's nano weapons are impossible: the nano businessmen feared that the Congress would allocate "nano money" to Drexler and the Foresight Institute, and hence the civilian or commercial nanotechnology would receive less! Why should the Congress take the risk? Perhaps molecular nano weapons ARE impossible?

In the 1940s, Roosevelt's government did finally finance the nuclear Manhattan Project. Germany declared war on the United States! But why take a risk when the Sino-American relations are so peaceful, benign, profitable?

Hence American scientists wishing to work in those fields in which Thomas Bearden works (on his pension?) are not free to work in these fields if they have no money to live on! On the other hand, in China in alliance with Putin's Russia such scientists are free to work in these fields, for the dictators of China provide the money no matter how slim are the chances of success in the development of certain post-nuclear superweapons.

Characteristically, both Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden and Col. Byron Weeks are retired. Their pensions give them financial independence however small. The Pentagon's officials or officers who are not retired obey the orders of their superiors and the latter those of THEIR superiors and so on up to the Secretary of Defense , who obeys the orders of the Commander-in-Chief. In the past six years, Donald H. Rumsfeld cooed from time to time something philosophical about China like his puzzlement as to why China's military power grows if she has no enemies.

It is in this way of obeying orders and philosophizing innocently and safely that the Pentagon crawled into the war in Iraq, a small Third-World oil country, without suspecting the possibility of a Sunni guerrilla war though guerrilla war has existed under this name for about two centuries.

Thomas Bearden and Byron Weeks sound not like the Pentagon's officials, such as Rumsfeld, but like free spirits, critical intellectuals, thinkers. They do not have billions of dollars to start even one Manhattan Project in one field. But at least they have their pensions to work and think individually, and say publicly what they think.

The fact that Thomas Bearden spoke of Russia and China in the same breath deserves one comment. According to a poll carried out by the by-no-means-pro-government Ekho Moskvy radio station last year, 74 percent of listeners thought Russia and China should be allied against the United States. The Sino-Russian cooperation in the development of superweapons may thus become decisive.

These 74 percent do not perceive the mortal danger of China to Russia? No! But what about the Westerners? What is the percentage of those of them who do not perceive the mortal danger of China to the West?

In 1941 and 1942, Nazi Germany occupied a considerable part of European Russia and might have occupied all of it. Hence Siberia was to be, in scientific research, a second Russia. Today it is being occupied-not by Hitler's tanks, but by Hu Jintao's money. Academgorodok (Academic City) near Novosibirsk houses more than 50 research institutions, employing 18,000 scientists, some of them unique. China supplies 80 percent of the Academic City's income, and the Russian scientists are happy to fill Chinese orders for whatever is necessary to create the most advanced superweapons in which "the U.S. is still well behind," as Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden put it, and Col. Byron Weeks concluded that "America will burn because we do not have the most powerful weapons on earth."

Lev Navrozov's (navlev@cloud9.net] new book is available on-line at www.levnavrozov.com. To request an outline of the book, send an e-mail to webmaster@levnavrozov.com.

Monday, April 10, 2006

Print this Article Print this Article Email this article Email this article Subscribe to this Feature Free Headline Alerts