World Tribune.com

Year-old U.S. 'exit strategy' timed for midterm elections

SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Tuesday, August 9, 2005

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration has been drafting plans for a withdrawal in 2006 that would not depend on Iraqi military capability or the Sunni insurgency.

Administration sources said the plans reflected what they termed an "exit strategy" outlined nearly a year ago. They said the strategy envisioned the start of a steady reduction in U.S. forces in early 2006 following two Iraqi national elections, and before the U.S. congressional elections later in the year.

Nearly 50 American soldiers have been killed in Iraq in less than three weeks, most of them by improvised explosive devices, Middle East Newsline reported.

"The strategy is based on a simple premise," an administration source said. "We've been in Iraq going on three years and it's time to leave. After the Iraqi elections, there is nothing more we can do for that country except bleed for it."

Elements of the administration plan were leaked amid a spike in U.S. military casualties in Iraq.

"By next summer we'll be getting ready for congressional elections in the United States," [Ret.] U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Bill Nash, director of the Center for Preventive Action at the Council on Foreign Relations, said in a radio interview. "So the administration is quite anxious, of course, to get this problem, if you will, behind them and turn it over to the Iraqis."

The sources said U.S. Central Command has worked with the Defense Department to draft a plan that would increase the U.S. military presence from the current 138,000 to 160,000 troops by October, during the referendum for an Iraqi constitution. The force would remain to ensure the election in December for a new Iraqi National Assembly.

Pentagon spokesman Lawrence Di Rita pointed out that the U.S. military presence in Iraq rose to about 160,000 for the first post-Saddam Hussein election in January 2005. Di Rita said the U.S. troop level returned to about 138,000 several weeks later.

"It's perfectly plausible to assume we'll do the same thing for this election," said Di Rita, who said no decision has yet been made.

After the two elections, the United States plans to withdraw the lion's share of troops from Iraq in 2006. By mid-2007, the sources said, no more than 20,000 soldiers would remain in Iraq, limited to training and mentoring Iraqi security forces, manning key bases with U.S. air assets, and comprising a rapid response team meant to bolster Iraqi forces in case of emergency.

Elements of the plan have been discussed with chairpersons of House and Senate committees that oversee the military. The sources said the plan has been generally welcomed amid an assessment that the Iraqi military and security forces were increasing their counter-insurgency capability.

"There is a growing strong core of strength in the Iraqi military, that it's standing and fighting, that it's doing its share of the load," House Armed Services Committee chairman Rep. Duncan Hunter said.

The administration plan allows for flexibility in any withdrawal schedule, leaving the decision to Central Command. Central Command has drafted a series of options that envision a pullout amid either a decline in the Sunni insurgency or an intensification of strikes against the Baghdad government and U.S. coalition.

"The more restive parts are the more difficult parts, and one would suppose that those would not be among the first places that get turned over," forme Deputy Defense Undersecretary Douglas Feith told National Public Radio.

The sources said the administration plan was based on the assessment that the Sunni insurgency would last for years and that the biggest obstacle to stability would be the corruption and inefficiency of Iraqi governments.

They said the near-term goal of the United States would be to confine the insurgency to the Sunni Triangle while developing Kurdish, Shi'ite and Sunni areas that cooperate with the Baghdad government.

"Our stress is to work with the Baghdad government to ensure the operation and maintenance of military and security forces without our hands-on supervision," an administration source said. "It's been as challenging as our development of the Iraqi military itself."


Copyright © 2005 East West Services, Inc.

Print this Article Print this Article Email this article Email this article Subscribe to this Feature Free Headline Alerts


Google
Search Worldwide Web Search WorldTribune.com Search WorldTrib Archives