World Tribune.com

Cow capitalism not such a bad idea, N. Korea decides

Special to World Tribune.com
EAST-ASIA-INTEL.COM
Thursday, June 16, 2005

In 1998, Hyundai Chairman Chung Ju-Yung asked Pyongyang's permission to visit North Korea, not by flying via China but by driving through the truce village of Panmunjom where no civilian had been allowed to cross since 1953, when the Korean War ended with a cease-fire agreement.

Pyongyang granted the unusual request. One reason was that Mr. Chung proposed to cross the DMZ with 500 heads of cattle.

One of 500 cattle donated to the North in 1998, by the late Hyundai Chairman Chung Ju-Yung.
Cows are regarded as a state asset in North Korea and private ownership has been prohibited. Naturally, cattle are raised at selected collective farms and used as labor to substitute for scarce tractors and tilling machines.

During the great famine of 1994-1995, many North Korean villagers were executed for having slaughtered cows assigned to their care, according to North Korean defectors now living in the South.

North Korea was coming out of this "hardship march" and trying to rebuild its cattle herds when Chung's offer came. So it was a welcome gift.

For Chung, who fled his home in North Korea at the age of 14, stealing the money his father had saved from selling off the family cow, it was a 500-fold repayment of a nearly 60-year-old debt.

Chung's "cow visit" to the North opened the hitherto closed inland route through the DMZ. It was followed by a tour of Mt. Kumgang tour for South Koreans and paved the way for the first South-North summit meeting two years later.

North Korea has never disclosed what happened to the 500 cows and bulls that Chung donated in 1998. But now, seven years later, North Koreans report that a big change is being made in the raising of cattle.

The late Hyundai Chairman Chung Ju-Yung.
A North Korean villager, interviewed by operatives of the Buddhist "Good Friend" NGO in China, said that villagers are now able to breed and keep cows.

"Of course, when they are needed at the collective farms, farmers bring them to the farm for labor, but they take them home afterwards," he said.

The villager said that it was a "win-win" arrangement for both parties as the authorities can save the cost of caring for the cows while the farmers can lend them to other villagers for tilling and profit from the arrangement. He said all sides were satisfied and that villagers take much better care of the animals. The result is well-bred, healthier cows that generate more money for their owners.

"Most satisfied are the local officials, of course," said the villager. "They don't have the burden of looking after the animals as villagers are taking good care of the animals, and the villagers bring bribes and gifts. They are openly saying that this new arrangement (they still would not dare say the word 'capitalism') is not that bad after all."


East-Asia-Intel, www.eas-asia-intel.com, June 14, 2005
Copyright © 2005 East West Services, Inc. All rights reserved.


Copyright © 2005 East West Services, Inc.

Print this Article Print this Article Email this article Email this article Subscribe to this Feature Free Headline Alerts


Google
Search Worldwide Web Search WorldTribune.com Search WorldTrib Archives