No one should be surprised that Iran is poised to become a nuclear power.
Despite the seemingly rosy news of an agreement last fall between the
European Union and Iran to allow inspections of its supposedly
"peaceful" nuclear power program and the subsequent failure of the IAEA
to hold Iran truly accountable for egregious violations of
international treaties and agreements, there are years of historical
evidence that Iran's nuclear program is in fact not an energy program,
but a weapons program (IAEA denials notwithstanding).
The Iranians, of course, deny this. They insist that they are enriching
uranium strictly for "peaceful" purposes and President (Ayatollah)
Khatami now overtly claims that they have rejected nuclear weapons.
However, if one digs deep enough, one finds more sinister motives ø out
in the open for all to see. Probably no one has done a better job of
digging than Kenneth R. Timmerman who, in 1995, wrote Iran's Nuclear
Program: Myth and Reality, which was published by the Middle East Data
Project. He found four alarming statements by two Iranian leaders and
two other world leaders with regard to nuclear weaponry Ñ statements
that leave little doubt as to the Iranians' true intentions.
In February 1987, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khameini uttered
these words in a speech before his country's Atomic Energy Organization:
"Regarding atomic energy, we need it now. Our nation has always been
threatened from the outside. The least we can do to face the danger is
to let our enemies know that we can defend ourselves. Therefore, every
step you take here is in defense of your country and your revolution.
With this in mind, you should work hard and at great speed."
That certainly does not sound as if the Ayatollah wants nuclear power
to air condition his mosque!
An even more overt statement came a year later. In a broadcast over
Tehran radio in October 1988, the speaker of the Iranian parliament,
Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani made this chilling declaration that called
for the development of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear
weapons:
"We should fully equip ourselves both in the offensive and defensive
use of chemical, bacteriological and radiological weapons."
It was only after Iran's nuclear program began to grow and the Iranians
began to secure the assistance of Russia and China that denials about
their quest for nuclear weapons started popping up. But there is simply
no getting around the fact that the scope and size of Iran's nuclear
program is way beyond what one would reasonably expect from an oil-rich
nation. Between 1988 and 1995, Iran started construction on no fewer
than 15 nuclear facilities. That is the kind of active program that one
would expect from a country in a severe energy crisis Ñ or one that is
hell-bent on having nuclear weapons.
A lot more evidence of Iranian nuclear intentions surfaced during the
1990s. German and French security officials reported that, from 1992 to
1995, they foiled several; attempts by Iranian intelligence agents to
purchase equipment needed to create an atomic bomb. But perhaps the
clearest evidence spilled out in January 1995 in a nuclear deal signed
between Iran and Russia. After the U.S. strongly protested the
agreement, Russian President Boris Yeltsin acknowledged that the
agreement did in fact contain a military "component" and he announced
that he was voiding that portion:
"But it is true that the contract does contain components of civilian
and military nuclear energy. Now we have agreed to separate those two.
In as much as they relate to the military component and the potential
for creating weapons grade fuel and other matters Ñ the centrifuge, the
construction of shafts Ñ we have decided to exclude those aspects from
the contract."
Such statements make Iranian claims that they do not desire to have
nuclear weapons appear to be bald-faced lies.
There is still more evidence. Ukrainian President Leonid Kucha was
quoted as saying that Iran was seeking help from his nation to build
nuclear weapons:
"We need oil from Iran because Russia is strangling us. We have no
intention of responding to the repeated request by the Iranians to
share with them know-how on nuclear weapons, or to sell them any
equipment in this field."
To this day, Iran claims that its nuclear program is entirely peaceful
and they insist that they have no desire to have nuclear weapons. The
IAEA seems intent on taking them at their word.
Lest you believe that this is Bush administration "neo-con" scare
mongering, the threat posed by Iran's nuclear program was recognized
long ago by members of the Clinton executive branch. Way back in 1994,
the head of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, John Hollum,
predicted that Iran would have an atomic bomb in ten years Ñ in other
words, 2004. Also in January 1994, Undersecretary of State for
International Security, Lynn Davis, told USA Today that "Iran's actions
leave little doubt that Tehran is intent upon developing nuclear
weapons capabilities." Davis went on to say that "Iran's nuclear
acquisitions are inconsistent with any rational civil nuclear program."
Independent observers have also reported on Iran's nuclear activities.
And an authoritative report by the Monterey Institute of International
Studies written in 1995 quoted unnamed U.S. and Israeli intelligence
officials as saying that they believed Iran would be nuclear-armed in a
ten year time frame Ñ in other words, 2005. Citing sources within
Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency, respected New York Times
columnist William Safire reported last year that hundreds of Russian
scientists were in Iran building nuclear reactors and that, since Iran
sits on a sea of cheap oil, its only reason for building a nuclear
reactor was to produce plutonium for bombs.
Despite all these warnings over the years, we are getting perilously
close to a radical Islamist nuclear foe in Tehran.
Perhaps that is why the Iranians are now going to great lengths to
conceal the true nature of their nuclear program, perhaps so that they
can avoid a confrontation with the West before they have a nuclear bomb.
The Iranians seem to be using the playbook that North Korea
successfully used to become a nuclear power. First the Iranians feign
cooperation, then they prevaricate. They insist that their nuclear
program is entirely peaceful, then claim to reserve the sovereign right
to do as they wish with nuclear power. One day we may wake up and the
Ayatollahs in Iran will suddenly announce that they have The Bomb.
And then our options will be non-existent. Then it will be too late.
Christopher Holton is the Editor of www.WorldTechTribune.com and serves on the World Tribune Board of Advisers. He has been writing about national security, defense issues and economics for more than a dozen years. He is a full-time direct response marketing consultant and lives in New Orleans with his wife and five children. He can be reached at cholton@worldtechtribune.com.