World Tribune.com

Intelligence agencies in dispute over Al Qaida navy

SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Wednesday, February 18, 2004

HERZLIYA, Israel ø A debate at a recent intelligence conference involving Israeli, Indian and U.S. officials highlighted a disputed over the existence of Al Qaida naval capability.

The disagreement includes those who claim Al Qaida has control over as many as 300 vessels for smuggling and attacks on Western and allied shipping. Other intelligence analysts maintain that Al Qaida does not have a credible naval capability.

The debate took place during the two-day annual meeting by Israeli, Indian and U.S. strategists and officials in Herzliya, Israel. The conference was attended by Israeli ministers and the commander of the navy, Middle East Newsline reported.

"An Al Qaida navy is a contradiction in terms," Israel Navy commander Vice Adm. Yedidya Ya'ari said. "It is completely impossible. The minute they have a navy in existence, they become vulnerable."



Ya'ari, who called for a bolstered Israeli naval capability to fight Al Qaida and other Islamic insurgency groups, said his assertion was based on the assessment of Israel's intelligence community. He would not elaborate.

But India's intelligence community disagrees with the Israeli assessment. Indian intelligence, which provided the United States a large amount of information on Al Qaida, has concluded that Al Qaida has access to numerous vessels.

"They don't have to have a navy," [Ret.] Vice Adm. KK Nayyar, a former vice commander of the Indian Navy, said. "They just have to have access to boats. That's the same thing. Have they maritime capability? Yes."

Al Qaida conducted at least two major suicide naval attacks against Western shipping. In 2000, an Al Qaida boat packed with explosives rammed into the USS Cole in the port of Aden, killing 17 sailors. In 2002, an Al Qaida boat destroyed a French supertanker near the coast of Yemen.

The seminar also served as a forum to highlight the strains in the Indian-U.S. relationship. Indian participants reported U.S. State Department opposition to the transfer of American weapons and technology to New Dehli as well as differences over the U.S.-led war against Al Qaida.



[Ret.] Lt. Gen. R.K. Sawhney, a former director of India's military intelligence, said the United States allowed Osama Bin Laden and his key lieutenants to avoid capture by moving intelligence assets and troops from Afghanistan to the Persian Gulf in 2002. Sawhney said Bin Laden continues to operate along the Afghan-Pakistani frontier with impunity.

"The U.S. war in Afghanistan ended too early," Sawhney said. "At a certain point, the focus of U.S. intelligence assets shifted to Iraq and allowed him [Bin Laden] to escape."

In Washington, U.S. military commanders said Pakistan has improved its cooperation against Taliban along the border with Afghanistan. The commanders said Taliban forces have changed their tactics in Afghanistan and now attack soft targets in smaller units.

"The efforts that I see that have evolved with the Pakistani military here over the last two or three months show the greatest promise we have seen in a while of ensuring that those Al Qaida forces in those areas are driven out," U.S. Army Lt. Gen. David Barno, commander of Combined Forces Command Afghanistan, said in a teleconference from Afghanistan.

Print this Article Print this Article Email this article Email this article Subscribe to this Feature Free Headline Alerts
Google
Search Worldwide Web Search WorldTribune.com Search WorldTrib Archives

See current edition of Geostrategy-Direct.com

Return to World Tribune.com Front Cover