World Tribune.com


North Korean nuclear weathervane


See the John Metzler archive

By John Metzler
SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM

Tuesday, Oct. 7, 2003

UNITED NATIONS Ñ With the predictability of a weather vane in a windstorm, the North Korean regime has let fly rhetorical gusts regarding their nuclear program. During the course of one week, PyongyangÕs delegates sent the vane spinning from peaceful palaver concerning negotiations to rash claims that they are reprocessing plutonium and making nuclear bombs! Given the political atmosphere on the divided Korean peninsula, the barometer is falling and urgent diplomatic steps are called for.

Choe Su Hon, the Democratic PeopleÕs Republic of Korea Vice Foreign Minister told the UN General Assembly, ÒIt is the consistent position of the DPRK to resolve the nuclear issue peacefully through dialogue and negotiations. De-nuclearizing the Korean peninsula is the ultimate goal and initiative of the DPRK.Ó

He added, ÒIn order to resolve the nuclear issue peacefully through dialogue, the policy hostile to the DPRK should be changed fundamentally.Ó This would include a Òpackage dealÓ where Washington would abandon its Òhostile policy to the DPRKÓ and would sign a non-aggression treaty with North Korea. ÒSimultaneous action is a realistic way to for de-nuclearizing the Korean peninsula,Ó Choe said.

Not two days later, North KoreaÕs neo-Stalinist government announced that it is producing atomic weapons from the 8,000 spent fuel rods from the Yongbyon reactor, which would continue to be Òchurned out in an unbroken chain.Ó Though likely bellicose bluster, the CIA estimates that the Pyongyang communists have the capability to build six bombs over a six-month period. Hardly comforting given that the DPRK has had two nuclear devices for a decade.

Secretary of State Colin Powell advised, ÒThis is a matter of the most serious concernÓ but conceded, ÒThis is the third time they have told us they had finished reprocessing the rods. We have no evidence to confirm that.Ó

Pyongyang knows that nuclear proliferation Ñ no matter what their actual technical capacity Ñ concentrates its adversaryÕs attention and prepares the groundwork for blackmail. And given the ongoing controversy concerning SaddamÕs proscribed weapons, the North Koreans are deliberately muddying the waters to cause maximum confusion.

Jeong Se-Hyun, ROK Minister of Unification told a gathering of the prestigious Korea Society in New York, ÒIn convincing North Korea to attend the multilateral dialogue (Recent talks in Beijing among the Koreas along with the USA, PeopleÕs China, Japan and Russia) efforts by the United States and China have played an important role.Ó

The parallel track to this he advised, ÒIn addition to such diplomatic efforts, we have maintained the inter-Korean dialogue channel to persuade North Korea to give up its nuclear development program.Ó

Minister Jeong stressed, ÒWe will have to juggle improving inter-Korean relations while resolving the North Korean nuclear issue peacefully through international cooperation.Ó He added significantly ÒI would like to stress that the long term and solid-U.S.-ROK relations will not be affected negatively by the process of improving Seoul- Pyongyang relations.Ó

While outlining that the Seoul government is pursing this policy Òwithin the framework of close cooperation with the United States,Ó Minister Jeong added, ÒMy own conviction is that the best option is to create conditions for North Korea that will encourage it to abandon its resort to military threats, including nuclear weapons and missiles, and instead encourage it to pursue reform and opening.Ó

Jeong advised, ÒIt would be our realistic option for stabilizing situation in Korea that we pursue inter-Korean exchanges and cooperation while handling North KoreanÕs bad behavior through international coordination.Ó He added, ÒHistory shows that economics spearheaded the process of integrating divided countries.Ó

Realistic moves in dealing with a rational state player, but can this apply to the bizarre Marxist dictatorship in the quaintly titled Democratic PeopleÕs Republic of Korea?

While most sources clearly ascribe PyongyangÕs proliferation stance as a negotiating tactic in the DPRKÕs grand strategy, the possession of nuclear weapons remains sine qua non with regime survival. Confronted by its own political paranoia, Pyongyang may not be so willing to Ònegotiate awayÓ its rogue nukes.

Survival of Kim Jong-ilÕs neo-Stalinist rule sits at the core of the argument. That the South Koreans have surpassed their communist cousins economically, socially, and politically stands undisputed. Still in PyongyangÕs political never-never land this is not the issue Ñ rather itÕs an ideological interpretation of reality.

The signals are decidedly mixed. The players are reading different scripts. The dangers of miscalculation are frightfully apparent.

John J. Metzler is a U.N. correspondent covering diplomatic and defense issues. He writes weekly for World Tribune.com.

Tuesday, Oct. 7, 2003




See current edition of

Return toWorld Tribune.com's Front Cover
Your window on the world

Contact World Tribune.com at world@worldtribune.com