World Tribune.com

MBG22503701073

Rumsfeld, Powell at odds over threat posed by Syria, Libya

SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Wednesday, May 1, 2002

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has lumped Syria in the so-called axis of evil designated by the administration. The axis is comprised of Iran, Iraq and North Korea. Rumsfeld has also termed Libya as a leading threat to the United States.

The State Department, on the other hand, sees Syria as a stabilizing force in Lebanon and an important player in Middle East peace efforts. "We know that countries like Iraq and Iran and Syria and Libya and North Korea are developing weapons of mass destruction," Rumsfeld said. "We also know that those countries have relationships with terrorist networks."

Over the weekend, Syrian Vice President Mohammed Zuheir Masharqa returned to Damascus from talks in China and North Korea, Middle East Newsline reported. Both countries are said to be helping Syria's missile and WMD programs.

The Pentagon regards Syria as a terrorist sponsor and an emerging missile and weapons of mass destruction producer.

In contrast, the State Department has encouraged U.S. relations with Syria. Secretary of State Colin Powell held talks earlier this month with Syrian leaders and officials said Damascus has taken limited steps to help the U.S.-led war against terrorism.

Rumsfeld, who termed the above nations as rogue states, said Syria has followed Iraq in WMD programs. The defense secretary said this has included the development of Syrian biological weapons and interest in nuclear warheads.

"We know that their [Iraqi] nuclear scientists have been kept together and we know that they have an active appetite for biological weapons," Rumsfeld said. "And this is true also, for example, of Syria, and it's true of several other countries. But what will be done and when is above my pay grade."

Officials said Powell and Rumsfeld have also clashed over other Middle East issues including the Arab-Israeli conflict. They said Rumsfeld and other Pentagon senior officials have been given greater authority than their predecessors in shaping U.S. foreign policy.

Print this Article Print this Article Email this article Email this article Subscribe to this Feature Free Headline Alerts