Click here to return to the archive of columns by Edward Neilan
Bill Clinton and Singapore justice: Five strokes of the cane on the Presidential
backside?
December 15, 1998
By Edward Neilan
Special to World Tribune.com
SINGAPORE--Administration of some "Singapore justice" has been
suggested as one way out of the crime and punishment argument facing Bill
Clinton and the American congress and people.
Would five strokes of the cane on the Presidential backside end the
impeachment-censure dilemma and debate that is wrenching the collective
American conscience?
Could we then close the issue and get on with our lives?
It is very humiliating--and perhaps even illegal--to mention
inflicting physical pain as punishment on the President of the United States,
even though his actions have inflicted serious psychological
pain on many of his constituents. His misdeeds are more ridiculous than any
bizarre punishment that could be suggested.
Such action would not be my own recommendation. But I have heard it
mentioned frequently enough by American expatriate businessmen and
Singaporeans here over the past few days that it bears repeating.
Clinton said the other day that he would accept any sort of punishment
except
impeachment. Maybe, just maybe, his offer to bend over and take the primitive
swats--a gesture that surely would not be accepted-- would be an act of
contrition that would capture Americans' imaginations.
Singapore, you will recall, is the place where a young American man
was caned a few years ago for spray-painting graffiti on an automobile. An
uproar ensued in the U.S. as human rights advocates and sentimentalists,
decent folks and legalists, rose to condemn the sentencing as "cruel and
unusual punishment."
But the young man was a guest here and had agreed to abide by the laws.
On a television program in Tokyo at the time, I was asked what I
thought of the situation.
"He should take his punishment like a man," I said. "And then leave."
Following the advice of his parents and lawyers, he did just that. His
tender bottom remained that way long after the flight back home across
the Pacific.
Now, Singapore is no Banana Republic. Despite an overall aura of
"Asian values" and punishment that ranges from caning for serious offenses
by adults as well as minors to fines for chewing gum in the wrong part of
town, it is a well-run society.
Singapore is such an ideal business setting, for example, that Caltex
is moving its worldwide operations center here.
There is ample attractiveness in Singapore's own culture.
But American expatriates may arrive here and get in stride immediately
with such familiar names as Citibank, Federal Express, Starbucks, The
Coffee Bean, Morton's Steak House, Gap, Planet Hollywood, Borders Books,
Mcdonald's, Burger King, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Sizzler and hotels like
Sheraton, Hyatt, Westin and Marriott. The posh American Club on Scotts
Road is, in many respects, an anachronism.
The American inns have the amenities but not the charisma to match
local colonial-era icons like Raffles Hotel and The Goodwood Park.
It was not by accident that The Heritage Foundation of Washington D.C.
announced recently that Singapore had replaced Hong Kong atop its Economic
Freedom Index which it runs with the Asian Wall Street Journal newspaper.
In short, Singapore is a good friend of the United States. Its
leaders, including paternalistic senior statesman and former Prime
Minister Lee Kuan Yew, often dispense wise advice to Washington on the
China question.
So the comments heard here about Singapore justice in the American
context should not be dismissed as entirely off-the-wall, facetious or
flippant.
There is entirely too much of the "we're always right" attitude
emanating from U.S. officials and media which translates abroad as
uninformed arrogance.
There are several billion people around the globewho do not even know what
"inside the Beltway" means.
Thinking hard, asking difficult questions and proposing some
tough figurative, not literal, solutions may help us avoid such uncomfortable
situations as the present Clinton denouement in the future.
Edward Neilan (eneilan@crisscross.com) is a veteran journalist, based in Tokyo, who covers East Asia and writes weekly for World Tribune.com.
December 15, 1998
|