World Tribune.com


The future of the China market


See the Edward Neilan archive

By Edward Neilan
SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM

June 1, 2000

TOKYO -- Businessmen around the world continue to be fascinated with the prospect of making a fortune doing business with China.

The May 27 U.S. House of Representatives endorsement of the China trade bill, to be followed sooner later by passage of the U.S. Senate version, will perpetuate the imagined potential of selling to "one billion Chinese."

"Imagined" and "potential" are the operative words since very few foreigners have made old-fashioned "profits" in China.

In 1937, author Carl Crow wrote a book "400 Million Customers" (World Press, New York) carrying on the "oil for the lamps of China" myth that had captivated traders for centuries. As China grew, so did the market, as Australian Ross Terrill made plain in his 1971 book "800,000,000: The Real China." (Little, Brown and Co., Boston).

Jay and Linda Mathews, first of the now-popular husband-and-wife foreign correspondent duos, in 1983 published "One Billion: A China Chronicle" (Random House, New York).

By the time William H. Overholt had joined the chorus in 1993 with his book "The Rise of China," (W.W. Norton & Co., New York) there were about 1.2 billion Chinese.

A confession is in order: I played on the same syndrome in a book I co-authored in 1974 "The Future of the China Market: Prospects for Sino-American Trade." (American Enterprise Institute-Hoover Institution, Washington D.C.) There was a certain euphoria after President Richard Nixon's 1972 trip to China, and curiosity about doing business there captivated American firms.

The book was criticized by some for being overly-optimistic on the Beijing-Washington trade future. As it turned out, the predictions in the book were too conservative.

In 1973 U.S. exports to China were worth US$689.1 million and imports from China were $63.9 million.

By 1998 China had become the U.S.' fourth largest trading partner, selling US$71.1 billion worth of goods and buying US$14.2 billion.

But here was more than trade at stake. The 1974 book concluded:

''To take advantage of the changes, challenges, and opportunities that lie within the trade and developmental finance areas of the coming enlarged mutual relationship between Chinese and Americans, we must prepare ourselves much better than we have been doing, both in a bilateral sense and in our awareness of a changing world situation.

"There is much to be learned and understood about China, and there is a potential for interaction between the U.S. and China tomorrow that is scarcely imagined anywhere today."

The biggest issue between Washington and Beijing is Taiwan as Chinese President Jiang Zemin reminded U.S.President Bill Clinton in a telephone call last weekend.

But the feeling in Taiwan, at least, is that membership for both Beijing and Taipei in the World Trade Organization will ease mutual tensions and perhaps allow for some semantic, if not political, accommodation.

The admission of first Beijing and then Taipei into the WTO will greatly improve the relationship between the two adversaries, Taiwan former Foreign Minister Chen Chien-jen said in an interview.

Chen made the remarks on the eve the March 18 Taiwan presidential election. After Chen Shui-bian was elected President and then inaugurated May 20, he asked Chen Chien-jen to become Taiwan's de facto ambassador in Washington.

The former Foreign Minister said there was "no question" about Taiwan following China's tracks into the WTO once Beijing has completed pending agreements with a final fistful of countries.

"There is no question about Taiwan's admission," Chen Chien-jen said. "We have passed the requirements and signed 26 agreements, all except with Hong Kong. And Hong Kong is part of China so that is pending."

He might have added that the United States and Japan exerted pressure on China to agree unequivocally to Taiwan's immediate entry into the WTO after its own. Taiwan agreed to face reality and wait in line and even accept a name change, even though its own economy measures up to world criteria better than does China's.

Edward Neilan (eneilan@crisscross.com) is a veteran journalist, based in Tokyo, who covers East Asia and writes weekly for World Tribune.com.

June 1, 2000


Contact World Tribune.com at world@worldtribune.com

Return toWorld Tribune.com front page
Your window on the world