Dossier author’s libel trial in London was all about the U.S. plot to topple President-elect Trump

by WorldTribune Staff, September 2, 2020

During his defamation trial in London, Trump-Russia dossier author Christopher Steele bemoaned the leaking to the media of his Democrat-funded document which he intended to damage President-elect Donald Trump from the shadows.

Following the July 20-24 defamation trial, Justice Mark Warby, a judge of the High Court of England and Wales, must issue an ending.

Christopher Steele

“For aficionados of the 2016 Trump-Russia dossier, its creator’s defamation trial in London was full of twists and turns, though the plot is relatively simple,” Washington Times reporter Rowan Scarborough noted on Sept. 1.

The plot:

• Russian technology CEO Aleksej Gubarev is suing Steele, a former British intelligence officer, for libel. The last of the dossier’s 17 memos, all financed by the Democratic Party, said Gubarev hacked into 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s computers under pressure from Moscow intelligence. He immediately denied the claim. His lawyer, Andrew Caldecott, argued in court that because Steele orchestrated press coverage on his dossier in Washington (he made three trips), he is to blame.

• Steele’s defense is that BuzzFeed published the December 2016 memo, along with the entire dossier, without his knowledge. His lawyer, Gavin Millar, blames David J. Kramer, an associate of the late Sen. John McCain. During the winter holidays, Kramer met with BuzzFeed reporter Ken Bensinger, who photographed each page of the dossier after Kramer had left the room. The dossier was posted on Jan. 10, 2017, prompting Steele into hiding and disrupting Donald Trump’s transition and presidency.

During the trial in London, Scarborough noted that “Millar quickly threw Kramer under the bus, saying McCain’s associate lied to Steele when he told him that he didn’t know how the dossier ended up on BuzzFeed’s website. Millar also disputed Kramer’s written testimony that Steele had urged him to meet with reporters in Washington.”

According to a court transcript provided to The Washington Times, Millar said: “Now, it’s true there are a couple of self-serving disputed assertions about Mr. Steele in the Kramer question-and-answers in the U.S., viz that Mr. Steele asked them to meet Carl Bernstein and Mr. Steele knew he had given a copy of the pre-election memorandum to The Washington Post.”

Millar continued: “As I say, they are self-serving, they are hotly disputed assertions and we invite the court to accept what would be Mr. Steele’s evidence of fact, denying that he was ever told this by Mr. Kramer, and make the appropriate secondary finding of fact, and we don’t imagine the court will have any difficulty doing so, given Mr. Kramer’s admitted/apparent propensity to lie and dissemble, his motives to cover himself, the absence of any evidence whatsoever from him in these proceedings — as I say he is not being called as a witness — and the inherent probability of all this. There endeth the diversion into the world of Mr. Kramer.”

McCain hand-delivered the dossier on Dec. 9 to then-FBI Director James Comey, who already possessed most its memos via Steele’s emissary, Justice Department official Bruce Ohr.

“The dossier leveled about a dozen felony allegations against President Trump and his aides, none of which proved true,” Scarborough noted.

Millar also targeted then-BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith, who is now The New York Times’ watchdog news media critic.

“This raises a further issue, a further stage down the line in the chain of causation which I’ve not really even touched on in the analysis so far, namely that what happened as a matter of fact after Bensinger imaged the pages, assuming that’s what happened, and the editor of BuzzFeed sitting in his room somewhere deciding what to publish the next day, got his hands on a copy of the memo,” Millar said.

“How do you, how should you, as a court looking at this now, characterize Mr. Smith’s startling but conscious decision to place the 17 memos online, publishing them to the world at large in the form that he did, effectively unredacted. This, of course, was what we lawyers call the proximate cause of the harm complained of in this litigation.”

One of the trial’s new disclosures, Scarborough noted, was messaging between Kramer and Steele as the McCain associate was taking dossier material all over Washington, from news bureaus to the White House.

Cross-examining Steele, Caldecott quoted Kramer as telling him, “CNN reporting it now. Carl never got back.”

This is a reference to CNN disclosing the dossier’s existence before the BuzzFeed post. “Carl” is Carl Bernstein.

“Now, we suggest that Mr. Kramer was working his socks off, collecting detailed inquiries from the media, referring them to you, and reporting back, and effectively he was acting as your agent for communicating with the media whom you did not personally want to meet. Right or wrong?”

Replied Steele: “I disagree with that.”

To rebut Caldecott’s assertion, Millar read from a Jan. 23, 2017, message — roughly two weeks after the BuzzFeed post — from his client to Kramer.

The message, he said, “is [the] clearest possible indicator of how Mr. Steele regarded the BuzzFeed editor’s decision of publication in its immediate aftermath. Again, it’s wholly inconsistent with any suggestion that he intended or authorized or foresaw such publication.”

Steele said in a message: “I wonder if BuzzFeed have reflected on the lives and livelihoods they put at risk by publishing the dossier, or the shutter it has drawn down on any further collection efforts on this issue and others by anybody or any government agency. In my view BuzzFeed did the Kremlin’s work for them because they were determined not to lose the scoop entirely after CNN broke the original story. One of the most irresponsible journalistic acts.”

Another message shows Steele, ten days after Comey received the dossier from McCain, impatiently wondering if wealthy Republicans were “buying off the critics.”

Steele was on WhatsApp messaging to contact Sir Andrew Wood, Britain’s former ambassador to Moscow. It was Wood whom Steele tapped in November, after Trump had won, to approach McCain about the dossier at a defense conference in Halifax, Nova Scotia. With McCain was Kramer, who would be dispatched to visit Steele in London.

Caldecott decoded the names in brackets: “A [that’s Andrew], JM [that’s Senator John McCain] appears to have bottled it and left DK [that’s Mr. Kramer] exposed. Indications are that wealthy R [that’s obviously Republican] donors are buying off the critics. So much for patriotism, but John McCain has the information and therefore is compromised anyway. All quite depressing. Maybe let’s catch up in person later in the week. Best, Chris.”

Wood answered: “Yes, but not surprising. I thought the stratagem unlikely to succeed. What we see in the defense is the shiny white tip of the iceberg, but there are clearly other agendas lurking beneath.”

In July, in a separate case, the High Court ordered Steele to pay damages of $23,000 (£17,900) each to two Russian businessmen that he claimed had made payoffs to Vladimir Putin in the 1990s.

Judge Warby said that Steele had not taken reasonable steps to verify the allegations and had violated a data privacy law.

Steele had accused Petr Aven and Mikhail Fridman of facilitating the transfer of large amounts of money to Mr Putin when he was deputy mayor of St. Petersburg.

President Trump seized on the news, tweeting: “This man should be extradited, tried, and thrown into jail. A sick liar who was paid by Crooked Hillary & the DNC!”

Intelligence Brief __________ Replace The Media

You must be logged in to post a comment Login