Writer: Nothing expert about Washington’s foreign policy experts

by WorldTribune Staff, October 30, 2017

President Donald Trump’s foreign policy has been publicly disparaged recently by several Republicans who tout their own foreign policy credentials, including former President George W. Bush and Sens. John McCain and Bob Corker.

“Yet, long before Trump took over the national political conversation, the conservative foreign policy establishment had systematically betrayed conservative principles and abandoned intellectual rigor for ideological rigidity in foreign policy,” analyst Ying Ma wrote in an Oct. 27 op-ed for Breitbart.

‘At the UN in September, Trump offered a robust defense of sovereignty that was far more cogent than the tortured version from the Bush era.’ / AP

“Many individuals and institutions participated, but one example of how a major conservative think tank went about the task shows the insidiousness of the betrayal and offers insight into the intellectual disorderliness that led to Trump’s rise,” wrote Ma, who from 2005 to 2006 was a National Research Initiative Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

“It was the fall of 2005, and the Iraq War was raging. I had just graduated from Stanford Law School and given up a lucrative Wall Street law firm salary to spend a year as a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI).

“A few weeks into my fellowship, AEI issued what I perceived as a very unsubtle threat against me. I was told to stop conducting research on national sovereignty and international law and instead work on democratization in Asia. AEI understood that I was exploring opportunities in Vice President Dick Cheney’s office, and if I did not listen they would make sure I did not succeed.

“I had been a conservative my entire adult life. Never did I imagine that this venerable institution of conservative thought would threaten me for attempting to put conservative thoughts on paper, but it did,” wrote Ma who served as the deputy director of a pro-Trump super PAC during the presidential election of 2016.

“My research would have critiqued certain intellectual inconsistencies in Bush’s foreign policy. His administration’s dogged promotion of the freedom agenda directly conflicted with its robust defense of national sovereignty, leaving U.S. foreign policy looking confused, incoherent, and hypocritical. …

“The real intellectuals at AEI were dismayed upon discovering the think tank’s interference with my research. When the late Jeane Kirkpatrick, President Ronald Reagan’s ambassador to the United Nations, learned that I had been instructed to focus on democratization in Asia, she asked, incredulously, ‘Because you’re Asian?!’ Reality was not quite that crass, but it was pretty close. …

“Within the Bush administration itself, prominent senior officials, such as former UN Ambassador John Bolton, believed the idea of spreading a democratic revolution in the Middle East was wrong from the start. As the most ardent and identifiable defender of U.S. sovereignty in the administration, he observed that Iraqis should have been put in charge as soon as possible after the U.S. invasion. Exaggerating for effect, he said, ‘We should have…said to the Iraqis: ‘You’re on your own. Here’s a copy of the Federalist papers. Good luck.’

“One did not need to agree with Bolton to know that his sentiments reflected precisely the tensions I outlined and proposed to explore in the Bush administration’s foreign policy. …


“As the war effort in Iraq revealed in later years, there was gross incompetence and miscalculation, leading to trillions of U.S. taxpayer dollars spent and hundreds of thousands of lives lost.

“More soul searching and intellectual critiquing from within the right – against endless interventionism, against loose talk about the forcible export of democracy, against assaults on sovereignty – might have been quite productive before and during the Iraq War. Yet those who were supposed to serve as the stewards of conservative intellectual thought, who were supposed to facilitate such critiquing, failed spectacularly at the task.

“In the end, I undertook a project on democratization in China at AEI and wrote that while freedom in authoritarian countries was very much worth fighting for, U.S. efforts should be disciplined by the limits of its influence and the wishes of those who lived in unfree countries, not the ‘fervor of U.S. democracy promoters.’ Since leaving AEI, I have argued repeatedly that reckless interventionists do not represent conservatism, and that conservative principles – such as prudence and skepticism of large government undertakings overseas – needed to be re-inserted in the GOP’s foreign policy debate.

“Ironically, it has been left up to Trump to stomp on the type of foreign policy advocated by AEI.

“During the campaign, many Never Trumpers, including fellows from AEI, griped that Trump knew little about foreign policy and swung ‘from isolationism to military adventurism within the space of one sentence.’

“Yet it was candidate Trump who offered what Americans were thirsting for: common sense. While former Governor Jeb Bush had difficulty declaring the Iraq War waged by his brother to be a mistake, Trump denounced it as a complete disaster and promised an end to ‘stupid, endless wars.’

“As president, Trump has continued to undo the intellectual sloppiness of Bush’s worst foreign policy excesses. At the UN in September, Trump offered a robust defense of sovereignty that was far more cogent than the tortured version from the Bush era. While vehemently defending U.S. sovereignty, Trump also offered respect for other countries’ sovereignty, and officially threw aside the forcible export of democracy as a goal in U.S. foreign policy.

“Of course, Trump’s views on sovereignty and his foreign policy are a work in progress. He is by no means pitch perfect, but his supporters also know that many Trump haters on the right are often just as phony as those on the left. They also know that Trump’s bombast and hyperbole, as well as his instincts for common sense, are a refreshing improvement over the stale thinking of the past and the disgraceful practices employed to bolster it.

“Instead of congratulating themselves, Trump haters on the right should spend more time reflecting on how conservative politicians, thinkers, and institutions failed conservatism and the American people well before Trump came along.”


Subscribe to Geostrategy-Direct __________ Support Free Press Foundation

Be Sociable, Share!

FACEBOOK Comments

Login To Your FaceBook to Make Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment Login