MOBILE DEVICES
Free Headline Alerts     
Worldwide Web WorldTribune.com

  breaking... 


Monday, May 25, 2009

Israeli: Obama 'wasn't empathetic to our needs'

JERUSALEM — Israel is bracing for what officials called a confrontational U.S. policy.   

"From the banks of the Potomac in Washington it is not always clear what the real situation here is," Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Moshe Ya'alon said. "This is where Israel must step in and help her ally understand the situation."

Officials said the May 18 meeting between President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not lead to any agreements or understandings regarding either the West Bank or Iran. They said Obama, encouraged by his Jewish advisers, stressed that the U.S. aim to establish a Palestinian state would determine Washington's relations with the Jewish state.

"Obama listened and even smiled, but you could see he wasn't empathetic to our needs," an official said.

Also In This Edition


Officials said the Netanyahu government has been bracing for heightened tension with the Obama administration. They said the White House was leading a pressure campaign on the Jewish state to withdraw from parts of the West Bank in wake of Obama's scheduled address to the Muslim world on June 4.

Since then, officials said, Israel has been pressed by leaders of both the Democratic-controlled House and Senate to take measures against the 300,000-member Jewish community in the West Bank. The congressional leaders have warned the Netanyahu government that the United States was becoming impatient with Israel's policy of sustaining Jewish residential areas in the West Bank.

Ya'alon said the Netanyahu government has pledged to dismantle Jewish communities deemed unauthorized. But the minister, a former chief of staff, pledged that Israel would not agree to a freeze on Jewish construction in the West Bank.

"We will not halt the construction in the settlements within the framework of natural growth," Ya'alon told a television interview on May 23. "There are people here who are living their lives, raising children. Housing is required. It wasn't housing that has prevented peace."

Officials said Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak have agreed to dismantle at least 26 unauthorized Jewish communities in the West Bank. They said the military and police launched the campaign in late May with the demolition of the tiny community of Maoz Esher in the northern West Bank.

Other ministers have argued against the demolition of unauthorized Jewish communities while ignoring what they termed illegal Arab construction. An Israeli military report said authorities have not moved against unlicensed Arab construction in the West Bank for at least 18 months.

"[Jewish] outposts do not have to be dismantled now," Interior Minister Eli Yishai said. "There is rampant illegal construction by Palestinians and Israeli Arabs. If we go for enforcement, then enforcement has to be unified, just and equitable."

Officials said Netanyahu has argued that Israel already agreed to limit Jewish construction in the West Bank in negotiations with the previous administration of President George Bush. In 2005, they said, the two sides agreed to an understanding in which Israel would continue to construct housing in eastern and northern Jerusalem as well as in Jewish communities organized in blocs in the West Bank.

"We do not intend to build any new settlements, but it wouldn't be fair to ban construction to meet the needs of natural growth or for there to be an outright construction ban," Netanyahu said during a Cabinet meeting on May 24.

For his part, Barak has rejected the U.S. demand for a halt to all Jewish construction in the West Bank. The defense minister said the government would permit what he termed "natural growth" in Jewish communities.

"There cannot be a situation whereby a father of two who bought a 54-square-meter apartment and then decides to enlarge his family would be forbidden from adding two rooms because of an order by the United States," Barak said. "This makes no sense."

Still, Ya'alon did not rule out harsh American pressure during the next visit by U.S. envoy George Mitchell. Mitchell was expected to arrive in Israel soon after Obama's address to the Muslim world, issued in Cairo, Egypt.

"We'll see whether their [U.S.] declarations become actual demands," Ya'alon said. "We won't let them threaten us."




Comments


I would wager one of the primary reasons for invading Iraq was pressure from Israel. That was a great strategic move (embolden Iran). What a great benefit from the U.S./Israeli relationship.

Steve      11:51 a.m. / Wednesday, May 27, 2009


It is hard to imagine how ill-informed so many are about Israel and its relations with the U.S. after all of these years. Israel received on average $2.8 billion per year. $1.8 B stays in the U.S. to purchase arms and military supplies built in the U.S. - meaning jobs. Israel has repaid the U.S. on all of its loans, unlike countries, such as Egypt, which has had an almost equivalent amount of aid, but has had its mammoth debt excused. Israel has contributed an incalculable amount to the U.S. and not only militarily. It has our back, maintains safeguards to our sea trade routes, and has made innumerable contributions for the U.S. and the international community, including medical cures for Arab populations, IT advances, including the cell phone. Hate precludes productive thinking, and always boomerangs on the hater. Facts are facts and like the Truth have a life of their own.

Carol      10:30 a.m. / Wednesday, May 27, 2009


Abdul - Patriot, Robert Firth, Angus MacPherson and other critics...
1. Why do you not complain about the billions spent by the U.S. on assistance to Egypt, Pakistan and other Moslem and non-Moslem dictatorships...
2. Why do you not complain about the fact that the U.S. sells weapons to the Egypt, Saudi Arabia and other enemies of Israel, weapons that incorporate Israeli technologies.

Abdul      1:30 p.m. / Tuesday, May 26, 2009


Abdul - Aid to Israel small? $140b+ (thru 2003) is not tiny (ifamericansknew.org/stats/usaid.html). True some aid involves credit for U.S. services/materials - wouldn't you prefer our tax money spent on our own internal needs (better transit systems., airports, alt. energy, schools, assistance to America's poor)? Regarding military aid supplied to Israel - Israel is notorious for selling our military tech to other countries. [do NOT publish my email address - thanks]

Patriot      10:42 a.m. / Tuesday, May 26, 2009


To Aldred, Firebird and others...
    1. If the U.S. would for once let Israel really win (and nor kiss Saudi...), and beat its enemies decisively, no more U.S. assistance would be required.
    2. The financial cost of supporting Israel is very low in comparison to the benefits for the U.S.
    3. Israel does not generally get pure cash and must use the U.S. assistance to buy American products made by American workers.
    4. The experience acquired by the Israeli military with the blood of its soldiers, is then incorporated into the American weapons etc., which then gives American soldiers a better chance of survival in Iraq and Afghanistan, etc.

Abdul      11:00 p.m. / Monday, May 25, 2009


What part of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention does Israel not understand? The settlements are illegal - all of them - and the U.S. must insist on their unconditional removal.

Robert Firth      9:40 p.m. / Monday, May 25, 2009


People still act like Obama is making real decisions on his own, when in fact he is simply a puppet for his globalist, eugenics minded masters. And whatever tune they want this guy to dance to, he will. Period. To assume his "empathy" to Israel has any bearing in this is absurd. He is simply doing what he is told to do by a bunch of whites.

Angus MacPherson      9:40 p.m. / Monday, May 25, 2009


If they don't like it ..... QUIT CASHING THE WELFARE CHECKS. "Nations" are self supporting, they do not live off the CHARITY of others.

Aldred      7:12 p.m. / Monday, May 25, 2009


Well then, Israel can give back all the free money the citizens of the U.S. have given them over the years, and they can fend for themselves!

Firebird      7:00 p.m. / Monday, May 25, 2009

About Us     l    Contact Us     l    Geostrategy-Direct.com     l    East-Asia-Intel.com
Copyright © 2009    East West Services, Inc.    All rights reserved.