Stockholm report: Middle East arms race leads to worldwide military spending increase
|
SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Friday, June 15, 2001
LONDON Ñ The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute said in its latest
report that the arms race in the Middle East and Asia have led to a rise in
world military expenditures. The spending has been on the rise since 1998,
when it was at the lowest level of the post-Cold War period.
The United States is expected to be the leading beneficiary of Middle
East instability. a new report says.
The report said Middle East arms purchases are also expected to
revive the sagging arms market and improve U.S. exports. Total world
military expenditure in 2000 amounted to about $798 billion, an increase of
2.3 percent.
The report said Israel and Egypt have ordered enough
weapons from the United States to enable American defense contractors to
emerge from the sales slump last year.
"The strong supplier position of the USA is complemented by its attempts
to influence the arms export behaviour of other countries in support of US
policies," the report said. "In 2000 the main countries which the USA tried
to influence were Australia, Israel and the UK."
"Attempts to sustain or increase regional stability through arms
supplies, illustrated by countries in Asia and the Middle East, seem
unlikely to be successful in the long term," the Sipri report said. "In
addition, whether under international arms embargoes Ñ including mandatory
UN embargoes Ñ or not, recipients in conflict regions receive supplies of
major conventional weapons."
The report cited Israel and Turkey as two of the 15 leading arms
recipients during the period of 1996 to 2000. Both countries were involved
in conflict last year.
The Swedish institute said Israel would continue to be engaged in
conflict with the Palestinians. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, the
report said, would not be able to fulfill Palestinian demands.
"He [Sharon] is offering the Palestinians much less than Ehud Barak,
whose proposals they turned down," the report said. "The Palestinian
position has hardened as a result of the bloodshed of recent months, and
after SharonÕs victory the Palestinian leadership on the ground called for
an escalation of the intifada [uprising]. As for the longer term, there is
widespread recognition that there is no alternative to a peace process in
the Middle
East."
The report, citing the weakening of international sanctions, also
expressed skepticism over efforts to end Iraq's nonconventional programs.
|