U.S. considers retreat from no-fly zones after failed strikes
SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Tuesday, March 13, 2001
WASHINGTON Ñ The Bush administration is reviewing a plan to
significantly reduce U.S. and British patrols of no-fly zones in
southern and northern Iraq.
Officials said the plan presented to the Pentagon is based on the
assessment that Iraqi anti-aircraft capability could eventually shoot down a
U.S. or British warplane. The administration has also concluded that the
overflights are hurting Washington's drive to maintain even limited
international sanctions on Baghdad.
Last month, U.S. and British warplanes attacked anti-aircraft sites
around Baghdad in an attempt to stop the linking of batteries to radar
systems. The Iraqi project, carried out by Chinese technicians, was said not
to have been affected by the allied bombing.
Officials said the British have complained that their warplanes are
particularly vulnerable to Iraqi missile attack. They cited the lack of
British electronic warfare planes to jam Iraqi radar.
The administration plan was outlined to Congress during a closed hearing
by the House Appropriations defense subcommittee last week. Army Gen. Tommy
Franks, head of the U.S. Central Command, outlined reports that he and other
military advisers are presenting to the administration.
Franks was said to have told the committee that Washington will continue
to ensure that Iraq does not violate the no-fly zones or produce weapons of
mass destruction. But the effort would not rely on such routines as daily
air patrols over Iraq.
"As part of this approach to the problem, we would also make sure that
the Iraqi regime understood that we reserve the right to strike militarily
any activity out there, any facility we find that is inconsistent with their
obligations to get rid of such weapons of mass destruction," U.S. Secretary
of State Colin Powell told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week.
Tuesday, March 13, 2001
Subscribe to World Tribune.com's Daily Headline Alert
Click Above To Subscribe
|