|
Don't stop the presses: Democrats propose a newspaper bailout in Connecticut
|
|
Seven legislators from the area served by The Bristol Press and The Herald in New Britain today wrote to the state Department of Economic and Community Development to ask for its help in preventing the closure of the newspapers.
We’ll have more on this breaking news later, but for now, here’s the letter.
It’s also encouraging today to see that Jim Romenesko’s daily email roundup of media news for the Poynter Institute, which the whole industry reads, featured at the top of its list the story about Gov. Jodi Rell and Attorney General Richard Blumenthal’s willingness to lend a hand to the effort to save the papers. At the very least, it’s better to go down shouting than to slip quietly into the night.
They’ve only just begun. Not only are the newspaper moochers trying to argue that their services are so “vital” that they deserve taxpayer handouts, they are also arguing that they need federal newspaper subscription subsidies to help make voters smarter.
See the following in the Washington Post:
[H]istorian Rick Shenkman, author of "Just How Stupid Are We?" thinks reform needs to start in high school. His strategy is both poetic (to certain ears) and pragmatic: Require students to read newspapers, and give college freshmen weekly quizzes on current events.
Did he say newspapers?! Shenkman even suggests government subsidies for newspaper subscriptions, as well as federal tuition subsidies for students who perform well on civics tests. They could be paid from a special fund created by, say, a "Too Many Stupid Voters Act."
Not only would citizens be smarter, but also newspapers might be saved. Announcements of newsroom cuts, which ultimately hurt quality, have become routine. Just this week, USA Today announced the elimination of about 20 positions, while the Newark Star-Ledger, as it cuts its news staff by 40 percent, lost almost its entire editorial board in a single day.
|
Will Bush-bashing end? Hah
|
There is a strange symmetry between the Bush hatred that emanated from the Left and what the writer John Avlon calls "irrational Obama exuberance." Barack Obama has not spent one day as President, yet his admirers speak and write as if he has not and will not do anything wrong. I agree with Avlon that Obama's centrist Cabinet choices have encouraged confidence in his ability to tackle our country's problems. But when President Obama steps into the oval office, like any other President who is a human being, he will call some shots incorrectly, and polls will reflect disillusionment among his followers.
|
Black Friday: Hysteria vs History
|
|
We have finally entered (I think) what must be history's longest- and most eagerly-awaited recession. News reports and commentary have been so relentlessly negative for so long that it is easy to lose sight of the actual performance of the economy. This happened again this week, with universally-gloomy predictions for "black Friday," the opening of the Christmas shopping season. Yesterday morning, the Boston Globe, to cite one of many examples, headlined "Black Friday takes a hit from the economy" and highlighted its pessimistic account with the National Retail Federation's prediction of an 11 percent drop in Black Friday shoppers.
In fact, though, most people's incomes are no worse today than they were a year ago, notwithstanding daily references to "hard times" and casual talk about a possible depression. That reality was reflected in what actually happened yesterday: a 3 percent increase over last year's "black Friday" sales, which itself represented a fat 8 percent rise over 2006. This photo is of shoppers lined up at 4:57 a.m. yesterday to get into the Best Buy store in my neighborhood, courtesy of the Minneapolis Star Tribune:
Yesterday's healthy sales came on top of a week in which the Dow gained nearly 10 percent.
This is not to suggest that all is rosy on the economic front; it isn't. The financial crisis is real, and we are most likely in a recession. But the hysterical terms in which the economy is discussed are unwarranted and unhelpful. They are also, I think, politically motivated. Reporters and editors like the idea of a looming depression (or, failing that, an unusually severe recession) for a number of reasons. If it happens, it will be taken as refutation of the relatively conservative consensus that has influenced government policies since the early 1980s--a consensus under which a great many people have flourished, but not, notably, reporters and editors. And if it doesn't happen, they will give the credit to Barack Obama and the more-liberal policies they expect from his administration. So for the left, hysteria over the economy is a win-win proposition. Not so for the rest of us.
|
Hank Paulson's son doesn't fall far from the taxpayer-mooching tree
|
The economic development rationale for pouring millions of tax dollars into sports palaces is bogus. These deals are brazen wealth redistribution schemes under the guise of "public interest" investment. Both Republicans and Democrats alike have supported the shakedowns. And now you can add Naked Emperor Hank Paulson's son to the list:
til Merritt Paulson came along, City Commissioner Randy Leonard had never been to Manhattan. Tom Miller, chief of staff to Commissioner Sam Adams, had never been to Kansas City. And the city's most visible business, the Portland Trail Blazers, had never been receptive to the idea of another major-league sports franchise coming to town.
It's remarkable what one guy with a rich father and an interesting idea can accomplish.
Just 18 months ago, Paulson, 35, was a midlevel National Basketball Association executive living in New York.
Since then, he's moved to the Portland area, bought two minor-league sports teams-baseball's Beavers and soccer's Timbers-and now has propelled himself into the spotlight with an audacious proposition.
Paulson wants taxpayers to spend $85 million to build a new baseball stadium for his Beavers and renovate PGE Park-just remodeled in 2001 at a cost to taxpayers of $38.5 million-for soccer. In return, he'll spend $40 million to bring a new Major League Soccer team to this city.
"I'm willing to make a bet on the Portland market-that's an easy bet to make," Paulson says.
It's also, judging from past experience, something of a longshot. Portland has historically disdained financing sports stadiums (billionaire Trail Blazers owner Paul Allen built the Rose Garden with virtually no public money).
"Portland's an 'if you build it they will come' city," says Brian Berger, a former Blazers employee who hosts the nationally syndicated show Sports Business Radio. "People here don't want to pay for stadiums."
|
|
How Obama got elected (continued)
|
a video by John Ziegler that showed some Obama voters being interviewed about their knowledge of the issues in the campaign. The video is funny, but also instructive. It was prepared in connection with a Zogby poll and the web site How Obama Got Elected.
Here are some highlights of Zogby's poll of Obama voters:
* 57 percent thought the Republicans still control Congress. Note that this is worse than a random result, since there are only two possible answers.
* Only 12 percent could identify Obama as the candidate who said that his energy policies would cause the cost of electricity to skyrocket.
The only issues on which the Obama voters were well-informed (or thought they were, anyway) had to do with Sarah Palin. Thus:
* 94 percent knew that Palin was the candidate with a pregnant teenage daughter, the highest correct score recorded by the Obama voters.
* Likewise, 86 percent knew that Palin was the candidate whose party bought her a $150,000 wardrobe.
|
|
Rumored National Security Adviser, Gen. Jones, harshly critical of Israel
|
|
General James L. Jones is widely rumored to be Obama's preferred candidate to be White House National Security Adviser. He is remembered as a strong propoent of strategic cooperation between the United States and Israel, particularly when he served as Commandant of the Marine Corps. More recently, while serving as Rice's special envoy for Middle East Security, Jones prepared a report on Israel's policies in the territories that Ha'aretz described as "extremely critical…scathing…makes Israel look very bad."
The Jerusalem Post said "this document could become a source of friction between Jerusalem and Washington." The World Tribune said it "blasted Israel's role" for "hampering the movement of PA forces, blocking plans for weapons shipments and technology to the Palestinians and resisting coordination." All three reports said that Jones wanted to publish his findings, but the White House decided to keep the reports confidential.
Jones has served as Supreme Allied Commander for Europe (2003-2006), Commandant of the Marine Corps (1999-2003) and Chairman of the Congressional Independent Commission on the Security Forces of Iraq (2007). In November, 2007, he was appointed by Secretary of State Rice as special envoy for Middle East Security.
During the final debate with McCain on October 15, 2008, Obama said this about Jones: "Let me tell you who I associate with... If I'm interested in figuring out my foreign policy, I associate myself with my running mate, Joe Biden or with Dick Lugar...or General Jim Jones, the former supreme allied commander of NATO."
|
Road to GOP redemption: Roll back the bailouts, draw a line in the sand
|
|
While Republican strategists and Beltway blowhards convene VIP retreats and meetings and save-the-party parties, the road to GOP redemption starts right now. There is opportunity to be seized right now. There is a line in the sand to be drawn.
Right now.
|
In the think tank for Obama
|
|
The Wall Street Journal has a report on the think tank from which Barack Obama seems to be drawing his top advisers.
WASHINGTON — The Center for a New American Security, a small think tank here with generally middle-of-the-road policy views, is rapidly emerging as a top farm team for the incoming Obama administration. ...
The think tank’s central role in the transition effort suggests that its positions — which include rejecting a fixed timeline for a withdrawal from Iraq — will get a warm reception within the new administration.
Michele Flournoy, who co-founded the center with Kurt Campbell, a former Clinton National Security Council and Pentagon official, now serves as its president. She is one of two top members of Mr. Obama’s defense transition team and is likely to be offered a high-ranking position at the Pentagon. Some Obama advisers say she could eventually be tapped as the nation’s first female defense secretary.
Wendy Sherman, co-head of the Obama State Department transition team, also serves on the center’s board of advisers and is expected to land a high-ranking post. Richard Danzig, a front-runner for defense secretary, is on the think tank’s board of directors. Susan Rice and James Steinberg, both of whom are on Mr. Obama’s short list for national security adviser, serve on its board of advisers.
|
DEMANDING equal time for Ayers' victims
|
Didn’t sleep much last night, so I was already feeling queasy when I tuned in to watch a bit of the Good Morning America interview with Barack Obama’s good family friend, Bill Ayers. Now, I’m really feeling sick in my stomach.
|
This just in: War's over, we won (No thanks to Barack Obama)
|
|
If Barack Obama had gotten his way, Iraq would now be in the hands of Islamists, and America’s image would have suffered a crushing blow. He voted to cut off funding for the troops, just when they needed it most, and still refuses to admit he was wrong.
Well, he was wrong, and George W. Bush deserves credit for refusing to back down when all around him were losing heart: “The war is over and we won.”
Michael Yon just phoned from Baghdad, and reports that things are much better than he had expected, and he had expected things to be good. “There’s nothing going on. I’m with the 10th Mountain Division, and about half of the guys I’m with haven’t fired their weapons on this tour and they’ve been here eight months. And the place we’re at, South Baghdad, used to be one of the worst places in Iraq. And now there’s nothing going on. I’ve been walking my feet off and haven’t seen anything. I’ve been asking Iraqis, ‘do you think the violence will kick up again,’ but even the Iraqi journalists are sounding optimistic now and they’re usually dour.”
|
Then and now: Reagan's response to 1964 disaster
|
This is not the first time that conservatives and Republicans have stared into an electoral abyss. After Barry Goldwater's crushing 1964 defeat, most political observers thought the only future for the GOP was to become a centrist party only slightly to the right of Great Society Democrats.
|